User talk:Russavia/Archive 15
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Russavia. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
- From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost
- Editorial: A digital restoration
- Election report: ArbCom election in full swing
- Interview: Interview with David G. Post
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Orphaned non-free image File:Stcrussia.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Stcrussia.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:52, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Air Malawi logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Air Malawi logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 07:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation! (reminder)
To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup. Note: this is the same message from last week, but you are receiving it because you have not removed your name from the list yet! Please do so if you still plan on participating. iMatthew talk at 22:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
help
Hi,
I need help. I noticed you may have dealt with blocked user hanzohattori and his legions of puppets in the past. I noticed a suspicious IP and put a request for check. Can you just take a look?
Thanks in advance, --TheFEARgod (Ч) 19:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
- Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
AfD nomination of Nebojša Koharović
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Nebojša Koharović. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nebojša Koharović. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Rollback
I'm guessing that this was a mis-click rather then a deliberate rolling back of another user's vote. In any event I fixed it. Spartaz Humbug! 04:24, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- thanks for that it was a misclick. I am using a mobile device and seem to have clicked it on my watchlist in error. Cheers Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 04:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed, and the final decision may be viewed at the link above.
- User:Piotrus resigned the administrator tools during the case proceedings and may only seek to regain adminship by a new request for adminship or by request to the Arbitration Committee.
- User:Piotrus is banned for three months. At the conclusion of his ban, a one year topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed, shall take effect.
- User:Digwuren is banned for one year. He is directed to edit Wikipedia from only a single user account, and advise the Arbitration Committee of the name of the account that he will use. Should he not advise the committee by the end of the one year ban, he will remain indefinitely banned until a single account is chosen.
- User:Digwuren is placed on a one year topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed. This shall take effect following the expiration of both above mentioned bans.
- The following users are topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for one year:
- User:Jacurek is topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for six months.
- User:Tymek is strongly admonished for having shared his account password. He is directed to keep his account for his own exclusive use, and not to allow any other person to use it under any circumstance.
- The editors sanctioned above (Piotrus, Digwuren, Martintg, Tymek, Jacurek, Radeksz, Dc76, Vecrumba, Biruitorul, Miacek) are prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with Russavia on any page of Wikipedia, except for purposes of legitimate and necessary dispute resolution.
- All the participants to the mailing list are strongly admonished against coordinating on-wiki behavior off-wiki and directed to keep discussion of editing and dispute resolution strictly on wiki and in public. All editors are reminded that the editorial process and dispute resolution must take place on Wikipedia itself, using the article talk pages and project space for this purpose. No discussion held off-wiki can lead to a valid consensus, the basis of our editorial process. Off-wiki coordination is likely to lead to echo chambers where there is a false appearance of neutrality and consensus.
For the Arbitration Committee, Mailer Diablo 17:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC) - Discuss this
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election result announced
- News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more
- In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
RE
Hi, thanks for the kind words! I've always thought we two can work together, despite occasional 'skirmishes', as neither of us is keen on advancing any specific POV here :).
I indeed find the remedies against me unfair, because the FoF of the arbitrators themselves does not show any considerable misconduct (they even couldn't find or didn't bother to do provide evidence on edit warring, let alone any POV pushing). After all, Biophys was not mentioned at all, Jacurek who was the first one to get a topic ban (6 months) had a record of disruption, according to the FoF. Thereafter, decisions to ban me, Martin and Vecrumba appeared. Wherease Martin rightly pointed out that an arbitrator had made a factual error, we soon learned that Arbcom is 'not looking for certainty'. But well, what can I expect from an Arb who has 1340 (!) article space edits so far.
I would have understood a ban on me from participating in Afd's for some time, but outright EE topic ban is pointless in that not a single disruptive article space edit was listed, and neutral, verifiable content edits should matter, after all. Therefore, I'll likely try to have the ban lifted one day, but right now I' just having a wikibreak, as my workload has been quite heavy during the recent months. So, happy holidays and hope we'll come across while editing Wikipedia in the next year, too! Miacek 13:16, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Have a happy new year
Choose whatever you like :) NVO (talk) 06:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK
The 25 DYK Medal | ||
Thanks very much for your articles for DYK Russavia. We can do with your articles, we still have many missing Russian articles you are bearing down on. Thanks from me and the wiki... oh! and seasons greetings .... many happy returns to DYK in 2010 Victuallers (talk) 14:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC) |
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
- News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
Help with a translation please...
Hello. Can you help me with a translation please? Do you know what the writing at the bottom of File:Tamara Karsavina -circa 1910.JPG says? Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to help, unfortunately I can't find a file with that name on WP or on Commons. Can you give the correct link and I will see what I can do. Cheers, --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 11:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- The file has been moved to the Commons, where it's located under File:Tamara Karsavina -circa 1910.jpg. I can't read the scribbles too well, though, because of the low resolution. It looks like it's four or five words, the first one of which is "Karsavina" (her name), the last one is "Bystrov" (probably the last name of the photographer; although the caption says that "photographer is unknown", so may be not), and "Gos. teatr" in the middle means "state theater" (I guess this one). What stands between "Karsavina" and "Gos. teatr", as well as between "Gos. teatr" and "Bystrov", I have no clue. Hope this helps at least a little.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:06, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
- Many thanks! Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi!
Happy New Year! I hope 2010 will be less stressful for you and and you will be able to contribute a lot to the Wikipedia. Alæxis¿question? 08:28, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
The 2010 WikiCup begins tomorrow!
Welcome to the biggest WikiCup Wikipedia has yet seen! Round one will take place over two months, and finish on February 26. There is only one pool, and the top 64 will progress. The competition will be tough, as more than half of the current competitors will not make it to round 2. Details about scoring have been finalized and are explained at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Please make sure you're familiar with the scoring rules, because any submissions made that violate these rules will be removed. Like always, the judges can be reached through the WikiCup talk pages, on their talk page, or over IRC with any issues concerning anything tied to the Cup. We will keep in contact with you via weekly newsletters; if you do not want to receive them, please remove yourself from the list here. Conversely, if a non-WikiCup participant wishes to receive the newsletters, they may add themselves to that list. Well, enough talk- get writing! Your submission's page is located here. Details on how to submit your content is located here, so be sure to check that out! Once content has been recognized, it can be added to your submissions page, from which our bot will update the main score table. Remember that only articles worked on and nominated during the competition are eligible for points. Have fun, and good luck! Garden, iMatthew, J Milburn, and The ed17 19:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Happy New Year!!
Happy New Year Scotty! Take care. I know that Australia meets New Year before Belarus! :-)) Vlad fedorov (talk) 20:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
- News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more
- In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Have you heard anything about this band? Are you allowed to edit Russian subjects? I haven't kept up with it all. Happy New Year! ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- i am still very much topic banned so i am unable to comment. I will be writing up an appeal over the coming weekend to have the topic ban relaxed to allow me to edit aviation and foreign relations articles, i dont foresee myself asking to edit articles such as the above linked one. I am sure that one of the wp:russia regulars who have my talk page on their watchlist will be able to answer your question though. Cheers Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 10:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Ambassadors of South Ossetia to Russia
I have nominated Category:Ambassadors of South Ossetia to Russia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 01:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- thank you for notification...but as i am topic banned i am unable to participate in the discussion. Please note that if nominating a category for discussion one should not remove articles from the category until it has been discused. And subcategories should also be left in tact, as there may be a categorisation structure in place that editors may want to study before commenting at a cfd. I can be contacted via email if anyone has further queries. Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 03:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Russavia! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 35 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Abdul Hamid Ali Hassan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
- From the editor: Call for writers
- 2009 in review: 2009 in Review
- Books: New Book namespace created
- News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
DYK for Lina Congo
Wikiproject: Did you know? 12:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Air Zaïre
Materialscientist (talk) 06:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Regarding Air Guinee
Good day, I notice you contributed to this article here: [1], yet you have "censored" or "starred out" references to the Soviet Union, and all the makes of the planes. Other editors have changed the Soviet Union usages, but we do not know what should fill in the blanks for the planes. Can you help?
Thanks in advance, --Taelus (talk) 10:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Russavia, I'm at a loss to understand why you did this as you are aware that Wikipedia is not censored. The issue has been raised at WP:ANI. An explanation would be apprectiated. Mjroots (talk) 11:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Jane's F-15
Hello Russavia. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jane's F-15, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to software. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 06:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Topic ban partly lifted
Since nobody has yet officially notified you, I'll do it here, even though you've probably seen it already anyway: As per this, your appeal to have your current topic ban lifted in parts has been granted. You are now allowed to include Russia-related topics in your edits relating to "aviation and diplomacy topics". As you understand, the topic ban remains in force on other topic areas, in particular anything potentially controversial about political disputes and ethnic history. It was generally noted that your appeal expressed a positive and mature attitude to the situation, and that you should be welcome to make constructive contributions in your area of expertise.
At the same time, it is my duty to trout-slap you for messing around with asterisks.
Best of luck, -- Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more
- In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
DYK for Air Rwanda
Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Air Mali (1960–1985)
Hello! Your submission of Air Mali (1960–1985) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! otherlleft 00:34, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- I do have a couple more questions (on the DYK page) about contradictory sources and the timing of the crash. The wording makes it sound like it was already on the ground when it crashed.--otherlleft 12:16, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Air Bissau
Gatoclass (talk) 12:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Royal Swazi National Airways
Gatoclass (talk) 18:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK
Could you comment at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Australia.E2.80.93Russia_relations? CW and I have been proposing a flurry of ALTs, and I'd like to have your take as the article author on those. Ucucha 21:56, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, got a little sleep and have offered my input on the alts. --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 04:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Australia–Russia relations
Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Just wanted to say good work again on the article. It was close, but looks to have made it on in time for Australia Day. Again nice job, It was quit an interesting and informative read. Kindly Calmer Waters 09:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
DYK for Air Mali (1960–1985)
Wikiproject: Did you know? 06:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Ghana Airways
The DYK project (nominate) 18:01, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Regarding your dyk hook
Hi, I modified your dyk hook here to clarify, as it sounded to me like the two companies managed the airlines at the same time. Hope the rewording is ok with you. Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 16:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Air Guinée
Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Elders Colonial Airways
Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
WikiCup 2010 January newsletter
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to Sasata (submissions), our current leader, who, at the time of writing, has more listed points than Hunter Kahn (submissions) and TonyTheTiger (submissions) (second and third place respectively) combined. A special well done also goes to Fetchcomms (submissions)- his artcle Jewel Box (St. Louis, Missouri) was the first content to score points in the competition.
Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
This article which you made several edits to has been nominated for deletion again. You are being notified of this as a courtesy. Regards.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 03:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Aviation Contest
Hi Russavia! This note is to inform you that your Aviation Contest submissions page has been archived from the previous round! You are now free to add submissions for this round! Note: This next round will run from January through February, so feel free to update your submission page with work from both months! Thanks, and happy editing! (Note: I will not be watching this space. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Contest discussion page. -SidewinderX (talk) 14:16, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Consulate-General of Russia in New York City
Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Royal Tongan Airlines
The DYK project (nominate) 12:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
- News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more
- In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more
- Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Philippines–Romania relations has been nominated for deletion again here
You are being notified because you participated in a previous Afd regarding this article, either at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Argentina–Singapore_relations or at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines–Romania relations, and you deserve a chance to weigh in on this article once again. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 00:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Monaco–Russia relations
The DYK project (nominate) 06:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
A bit late, but your request was filled.--droptone (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
- News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
El Al image
Hi Russavia! A while ago you uploaded File:El Al ocean ad.png, as a fair use image. It appears that the image is actually in the public domain. Do you have a higher resolution version? If so, uploading it (at least to Commons for now) would be much appreciated. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 16:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Diplomatic missions of the European Union
User:Alinor An editor with a keen interest in the EU has proposed to modify the article to list all the countries that do not have a mission of an EU member state, or only have one such mission. I do not support this edit, as the information does not concern diplomatic missions of the EU, only the missions of its member staets.
We have discussed this issue extensively in Talk:List of diplomatic missions of the European Union. I think what Alinor is arguing is that the embassy of an EU member can represent the EU as a whole, or provide services to other EU members. I do not believe this is the case. And even if such arrangements exist, it would be outside the scope of the article.
If you feel inclined, please join the discussions, make your own mind up and share your views. Kransky (talk) 00:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Embassy of Russia in Luxembourg
Materialscientist (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Captain German
There's an interesting article about a Soviet WWII partisan, [2]. Although the resource, seemingly, isn't "serious", the story is entirely enjoyable. However, the character is real, and some events in his bio can be verified (there's a Russian wikipedia entry). Have fun, ellol (talk) 15:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
- In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Proposed new map style for List of Diplomatic missions by Country articles
As a regular contributor to these articles your views are sought about a new map style for the List of Diplomatic missions by Country articles.
Currently we are using maps which show which countries host a diplomatic mission of a given country (please see as an example the map we use for List of diplomatic missions of Spain). These maps however do not show where the missions are actually located (which may be a few for those countries with large networks of consulates). And the title of this ("Diplomatic missions of Spain") and other similar maps could be more accurate
The map style I propose instead indicates the cities that host a mission of a given country. As an example, I have produced this map for List of diplomatic missions of Singapore.
It is not difficult to make these maps. They are based on the third map below (accessible at [File:Blank map cities shaded.PNG] on Wikipedia Commons), in which I have indicated all the world capitals and other major cities where diplomatic missions are located. The circles representing cities are not visible because they are slightly different shade of grey, but all you have to do is colour each circle with a distinctive colour, and in no time you can have a more accurate and easier to read map.
I think that this approach is more appropriate for this and other categories of articles which concern cities (such as List of national capitals, Lufthansa destinations, List of cities that failed in their bids to host the Olympics etc.), rather than countries.
Please add your views to this new proposal, including whether you like it, see problems, or see ways how it could be improved here
Thanks! Kransky (talk) 10:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)