User talk:Royalrumblebee/Archives/2024/December

Nomination of Martina Ononiwu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martina Ononiwu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martina Ononiwu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 09:33, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Oh my. I intend to still work on this article and, viola, it is already nominated for deletion. It could be sent back to me for redrafting to work on for a while, rather than outright placement as article for deletion within four hours of creation, as there are sources I have not included. My mistake for publishing too early. Just my thoughts. Royalrumblebee (talk) 19:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

@Royalrumblebee, present those sources in the deletion discussion. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 04:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

@Reading Beans, thank you for this. I replied before seeing your comment. I will add the links below my reply. Royalrumblebee (talk) 14:10, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:Teahouse without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Theroadislong (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

My bad, that was in good faith. I am sorry for that mistake. I noticed you had reviewed my articles and felt it was redundant saying they are unreviewed. I am learning every day. Thank you for this correction and grateful thanks for your hard work. Salute. Royalrumblebee (talk) 17:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Royalrumblebee! The thread you created at the Teahouse, My good articles are not reviewed; my worse articles are quickly AfDed, instead of AfCed, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)