User talk:Roneln

Welcome!

Hello, Roneln, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! D.Lazard (talk) 13:09, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at History of the function concept

I have reverted your edit at History of the function concept. The reason are essentially the same as that which was given in the preceding revert by another editor.

It seems that you do not know the basic rules of Wikipedia. So, I recommend you to read the links given in the above welcome message. In particular the The five pillars of Wikipedia. Wikipedia being a collaborative work, it is common that editors disagree on content, and procedures have been established for resolving such content disputes. Redoing your edit again and again is probably the worst method, as it may result in an edit block (see WP:3RR). The right way for solving such a dispute is to open a discussion in the talk page of the article, in view of a consensus among editors interested in this article (see also WP:BRD). You are welcome to start such a discussion as Talk:History of the function concept. D.Lazard (talk) 13:31, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sharaf al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī

thanks for your welcome message. if a user is reverting a new piece of information i would expect to get some reasons in a professional point of view that address the material along with the agenda and process platform of wikipedia. if you do have more info on this subject or you can refer me to someone that does i would appreciate it.

Al-Maqdisi invalid information

Hi

There is an integral disinformation and actual lies on that topic. Links do not exist and the claims are absurd and unbased. Ive made the changes and gave actual sources but it didnt go through. Please this is an important subject that falls into propaganda rather than actual history. Roneln (talk) 07:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

here are the relevant links:

The name of al maqdis derives from the hebrew word בית המקדש. It actually say that on the topic. He was born in Madinat al maqdis which is the state of jerusalem during the Umayyad Caliphate. (Which was the name of the region that started from islamic syria)

The entire place WASNT CALLED PALESTINE!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umayyad_Caliphate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_in_Jerusalem

https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=1638 Roneln (talk) 07:38, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Al-Maqdisi for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 23:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 06:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]