User talk:Rodgerdick

Welcome!

Hello, Rodgerdick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Networking basics, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 06:08, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Networking basics

A tag has been placed on Networking basics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 06:08, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Happiest Moments in Life

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Happiest Moments in Life. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Happiness. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Happiness - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Reconsider ! 07:41, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Writing

I am a new editor to Wikipedia.I have written two articles previously somehow both of them got deleted.I am trying to follow rules and regulations of Wikipedia.I would also like to write an article on Mr.Kent Emmons.I am a die heart fan of Mr.Kent Emmons and would like to write about him.My friends are also die heart fans of him so they insisted me to write about Mr.Kent Emmons and i consider Wikipedia as the best source to express you ideas.I want people to more about Mr.Kent Emmons.I hope this article content wont get deleted as previously two of my articles "Networking Issues" and "Happiest Moments in Life " got deleted.

Regards,
Rodgerdick (talk) 10:05, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

However, it is not "best source to express you ideas". There are many blog sites, or you may wish to create your own, or press release publication sites and services. WP is not the place to promote. Also, please review wp:sock. If you have an account, currently blocked, you should stop using this one at once, and if you wish to edit WP, ask to have that one unblocked. However, as you appear to be intent on using WP fro promotion, that seems unlikely. I have, indeed, removed your newest attempt to add wp:spam to WP.- Sinneed 13:32, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaulshikha for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. - Sinneed 13:43, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rodgerdick for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. - Sinneed 15:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sinneed,

Once again, the content I had posted has been deleted for Kent Emmons, so far I have posted atleast 4 times but somehow it gets deleted and my account also is blocked now.

Please note that, I have read the Terms of use carefully and it is not my intent to promote or use the website for traffic ranking.

I was wondering how the wikipedia page for Warren Buffets could be like an essay, please let me know what I need to do to achieve this

Waiting for your response.

Regards, Rodgerdick (talk)

Regarding Unblocking of my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rodgerdick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I always want to be a valuable contributor to add valuable information to Wikipedia.I am a very huge fan of Kent Emmons and he is an idol for me so that's why I wanted to write about him and want others also to know about him.Its really not about fame and even I know that Wikipedia has got some rules and Regulations to be followed on.Its a request if you could unblock my account. Thanks, Rodgerdick (talk) 09:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to apply using your primary account, not through this one which we know is a sockpuppet.--Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 10:42, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.