User talk:Rmjwiki

Welcome

Hello Rmjwiki and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Getting Started First steps • FAQ • Article creation wizard Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Teahouse • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 13:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Rmjwiki. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added Dismas. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Selling Energy

The article Selling Energy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Blatantly promotional article for consulting firm. No evidence of notability under WP:CORP. A WP:BEFORE is made difficult by the generic name of the company. There remains no evidence of independent third-party Reliable Sources clearly demonstrating WP:CORPDEPTH, rather than being literally press releases or thinly-churned press releases. Needs at least two or three of these.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 13:49, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rachel Christenson

The article Rachel Christenson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article, mostly written by an SPA. Grandiose claims that have no evidence of notability presented. All sourcing promotional or non-RS. A WP:BEFORE shows a few press releases about this Rachel Christenson, with most coverage being of other people of the same name. To keep this WP:BLP, we'd need independent third-party coverage in clear WP:RSes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 13:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]