User talk:Richwales/Archives/2011-11
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Richwales. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Nicosia
(copied from Seb az86556's talk page)
Hi. I'm trying to make sense of what has been going on today at Nicosia.
What, specifically, do you see as the problem with this change by MariaPetridou (talk · contribs)? I tried comparing the two versions of the page, and although I do see differences in imagery, it's not clear to me why one version would be preferred over the other. Is there a Greek/Turkish POV issue here that I'm missing? Sorry if I'm being dense here.
Also, are you saying that MariaPetridou appears to be a sock of Giorgoos (talk · contribs)? Richwales (talk) 23:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- a) there has been a discussion on the talkpage regarding the infobox-picture, and this is the current consensus-version (a collage that was specifically made for this article) b) Giorgoos and his socks have been replacing said collage with a different pictures (in most cases some skyline) over the past months without ever commenting @ talk or elsewhere. All this has me guess it could be Giorgoos, but I'm not sure. In any event, there's a talkpage, an Maria can use it. Cheers. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. Richwales (talk) 00:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Page protection
Would you consider semi-protecting Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal for the same reason as you did Paterno? Thanks. jheiv talk contribs 01:14, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- I've added this page to my watch list. I can't semi-protect it at this point because the vandalism hasn't reached a stage requiring more than manual reversion of each incident. If it gets noticeably worse, however, semi-protection may be in order. — Richwales (talk) 02:39, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- And I noticed more just now, and I've semi-protected the page for two weeks. — Richwales (talk) 02:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Serer people
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Serer people. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:20, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
3RR/Natural-born citizen clause of the U.S. Constitution.
[copied from talk page of Natty4bumpo (a.k.a. Chuck Hamilton)]
Chuck, not everyone who observes that there is controversy regarding "natural born citizen" vs. "citizen at birth" is a "birther". I, for one, am definitely not a birther. We're simply acknowledging that there is (and historically has been) disagreement over the exact meaning of "natural born citizen" — a state of affairs which long predates the current epidemic of Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories.
Also, a reminder that we (Wikipedia editors) are strongly advised to be civil at all times when discussing matters with our peers. Subtle nuances which are obvious in face-to-face conversation may not carry over to a print-only medium. We should avoid saying things that might be misunderstood as attacks or threats — and, by the same token, we should try to give others some amount of benefit of the doubt and accept that they might not really have intended something to be a personal attack. And since Wikipedia has a very strong policy against legal threats, it's probably best not even to joke around here about taking someone to court (just as you would never joke about certain subjects in an airport or on a plane) — not anywhere on the site, not even on your own user page or talk page. I see you've been involved with Wikipedia for some time now, so you've probably been exposed to this stuff before, but maybe a gentle reminder is in order.
And for what it's worth, I note that you've been blocked for two days for violating WP:3RR. This block was imposed by Magog the Ogre, not by me. — Richwales (talk) 21:52, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- "Citizen by birth" and "natural born citizenship" are the same thing. The two terms are used interchangeably in laws and court rulings. Chuck Hamilton (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Cites, please? — Richwales (talk) 22:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Common sense for starters, but I've seen several while researching this online the past few days. But since this is my talk page, not that of an article, that's all the explanation you're due. If you want them, go find them yourself. Chuck Hamilton (talk) 00:34, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- If you had asked more politely and less demandingly blunt as if you had a right to speak to me like that, you would have received a more polite answer. Chuck Hamilton (talk) 00:42, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- I meant no insult, and I'm sorry if you misinterpreted my abbreviated question as being discourteous. Understand, though, that if you do decide to try to add the above "used interchangeably" claim to the article after your block expires, you will be expected to back up your claim with citations to reliable sources. Per WP:BURDEN: "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." — Richwales (talk) 01:57, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm washing my hands of that particular article. Y'all have fun. Chuck Hamilton (talk) 02:17, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- And given your stated wishes, I've taken the liberty of removing a comment on the article that was left here, and moving it to the article's talk page where it belongs. — Richwales (talk) 16:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)