User talk:RhapsoDJ

Windows 5.0

Hello, 랩소디인뮤직

It appears you are engaged in edit warring in Windows 5.0 page. In other words, instead of following the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, you have chosen to perform a counter-revert, without a discussion or even without an additional explanation as to why you disagree with the original revert.

As I stated, the Wikipedia policy governing disambiguation can be found in WP:DAB and MOS:DAB. None of them sanction disambiguation of something that is not already ambiguous unless there is a strong evidence to the contrary. If you disagree, you can either provide the evidence to that effect, or else take dispute resolution steps.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 09:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Motion picture rating system, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 02:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Betty Logan: Please Search "Not for All Ratings" and check. And you can find it in MDA Official Site. --랩소디인뮤직 (talk) 10:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since I do not speak Korean then why don't you provide a link to the specific page outlining banned films if you know where the information is, or better still add an appropriate reference to the article for the changes you are are attempting to make? It is your obligation to provide a source for any changes you make per WP:BURDEN. Betty Logan (talk) 10:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Super Marisa Land

The article Super Marisa Land has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:Notability (video games). There are no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ana r chyte 03:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hoshimiya Shrine

A tag has been placed on Hoshimiya Shrine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 02:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Idolmaster Master Special for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Idolmaster Master Special is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Idolmaster Master Special until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Motion picture content rating system

Please do no alter the color scheme at Motion picture content rating system again, without obtaining a consensus to do so. A color scheme that accommodates color-blind readers was selected via an RFC at Talk:Motion picture content rating system#RfC: Should the comparison table in the article use a color scheme accessible to color-blind users?. I strongly urge you to read the RFC, understand the reasons for the existing color scheme, and then if you have any suggestions to make then porpose them on the talk page and obtain a consensus. Changing is disruptive and goes against Wikipedia's MOS:ACCESSIBILITY guidelines. Betty Logan (talk) 06:28, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about that edit, but I think that these two should be distinguishable: Restrictive: Restricted exclusively to an older audience. and Restrictive: Restricted exclusively to licensed premises / banned. No objections? --RhapsoDJ (talk) 06:32, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you change it again you will be reported for edit-warring and most likely blocked. Betty Logan (talk) 06:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Your recent editing history at Motion picture content rating system shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Betty Logan (talk) 06:29, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Please Save My Earth (disambiguation)

The article Please Save My Earth (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:2DABS. No other entries which meet MOS:DABMENTION or have an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of We Don't Stop (Kana Nishino song)

The article We Don't Stop (Kana Nishino song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign of notability; references are to the singer's website and iTunes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kana Nishino - We Don't Stop.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kana Nishino - We Don't Stop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Participate the RfC

Hello, RhapsoDJ! If you're interested in helping out for Talk:Motion_picture_content_rating_system#RfC:_Should_we_install_a_color_scheme_with_9_colors_in_the_comparison_table?, please participate the RFC and we can organize something. See sample:User:Zenkaino_lovelive/sandbox--Zenkaino lovelive (talk) 23:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Deaths by building collapse

A tag has been placed on Category:Deaths by building collapse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pandora's Palace moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pandora's Palace. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pandora's Palace

Hello, RhapsoDJ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pandora's Palace, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pandora's Palace

Hello, RhapsoDJ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pandora's Palace".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:46, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]