User talk:Reticuli88

Welcome

Hello, Reticuli88! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Fullobeans (talk) 18:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Ref desk alcohol question

Reticuli, I've noted your alcohol question at the Ref Desk on the talk page as a question of concern (see here). I note specifically that you've asked "what medically could be happening" and that your claims of "this isn't med advice" are moot if the content of the question doesn't back that up. Most specifically, I'm concerned that the question is an open invitation for diagnoses without explicitly requesting them. — Lomn 16:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Ref desk: Need names of specific theories or names at play here

I read the question after you already got your answer. Not that I would have any idea as to how to answer... But anyway, I just wanted to say that I understood what you were looking for from the beginning. It's not just you. A lot of people on the desks are just really anal about adhering to the rules there. And then some days aren't as bad as others. There was a discussion on the talk page once over someone asking if it was safe to swallow chewing gum. Some felt it was medical advice. Although a few days later, someone asked about whether they were being too emotional whenever they'd hear about someone else's death. It apparently made them rather depressed and they felt a great amount of empathy and compassion towards those who were relatives of the deceased. Several people answered giving info and opinions about empathy and such before anyone even mentioned whether the questioner should consult a psychologist.

I've found that phrases like "Could you point me to articles that discuss the ethical concepts that would be involved in the trial..." help a bit. Asking for articles instead of asking more open ended questions helps.

Take care, Dismas|^(talk) 19:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)