User talk:Reedlander

Welcome!

Hello, Reedlander! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Shakespeare Authorship Question: "Queen Elizabeth I" as a possible candidate?

Hi Reedlander,

Well, welcome to Wikipedia, but if you are just starting out, adding what you propose to an article as controversial as that on the Shakespeare authorship question is not the best way to begin. If you look at the talk page, and archives of previous discussions, you will see that this has been one of the most controversial articles on, probably, all of Wikipedia. Also, this has reached "Featured Article" status, which makes it even harder to get your edits accepted. And that is understandable, since the contents and form of this article have been debated and worked over countless hours by dozens of Wikipedians over years and years. So, unless you have something to add that is considered especially suitable for this article, and it meets with no serious objections on the talk page, you are not likely to get your changes accepted here. If I had not been the one to revert what you added, I can guarantee that someone else would have in short order.

One thing I might suggest is finding some other place to add what you want. That said, I see that the source you provided is a blog. Blogs are not usually considered to be "reliable sources" for Wikipedia articles, so that would probably be challenged too. A blog, in particular, would be rejected as a "self-published" source. See WP:SPS.

Though of the contributors to the Shakespeare authorship question page there are others who are much more knowledgeable than I am about who the most important candidates have been for considering as possible authors of Shakespeare's plays, I can tell you one thing: this article is a general consideration of the question and there is room to mention only a few of the candidates that have received the most attention over the centuries. And I can tell you with certainty that Queen Elizabeth does not even come close. You might want to look at the list of the more than 80 proposed candidates to get an idea of where she fits in (yes, she is listed there, as "Elizabeth Tudor"). It is possible that you could add a bit to the article on Queen Elizabeth, or something like that, but I couldn't guarantee that that will be accepted either.

If you are not absolutely determined to post something to Wikipedia about the belief that Queen Elizabeth was the real author of Shakespeare's plays, then I would imagine you could find something else much less controversial to contribute to. There is a lot of work to be done here overall, and it will never be finished. On the other hand, if you are in fact so determined, you are not going to have an easy time of it.

I am not saying this to discourage you. I sincerely do welcome you here, and I'm sure others do too. I would just, if I were you, read a bit more about Wikipedia's rules and practices and areas that need the most work, take some time to absorb it, and only then venture to make some edits, hopefully on something that is not particularly contentious. I know the importance of this approach; I have the battle scars to prove it.

Regards, Alan W (talk) 23:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Hmm, I see you also posted to the article's talk page. And as I suspected, others replied with pretty much what I'm saying here. You do seem determined to pursue this particular topic. All I can add is, good luck. I will add just one more comment. What you argue may or may not be true. But that is beside the point on Wikipedia. As an encyclopedia, this is a repository of accepted knowledge as found in "reliable sources", in this case academic publications of repute and standing. What you have to say might be an astounding original discovery; but it wouldn't be acceptable here, as it is "original research", which is absolutely forbidden on Wikipedia. That is simply not what Wikipedia is about. Again, good luck! --Alan W (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your detailed response. I appreciate it. Reedlander (talk) 02:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Reedlander, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Reedlander! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Religious views of Adolf Hitler

You must use the article's talkpage to explain why the omission of the sourced content improves the article, and how you believe that its inclusion constitutes "glorification." I'm not seeing it. You must achieve a consensus that the content is problematic before removing it. Acroterion (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2018 (UTC)