User talk:Red Avenged

Welcome

Hello, Red Avenged, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 16:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Howard King (referee) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 01:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Howard King (referee). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please discuss your content dispute on the article's Talk page, and try to achieve a consensus - edit warring achieves nothing -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 02:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#Vandalizing_of_Howard_King_wiki

I have not had a chance to fully review the situation and may not anytime soon, but I think you should be aware that at first glance your post at the Editors Assistance desk is coming close to violating our policy regarding WP:OUTING. Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 16:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A little more investigation reveals issues related to our policies

about living people and
reliable sourcing for content (blogs and forum posts cannot be used)

I have the article on my watch list and will continue to monitor the situation.Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 16:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I hope now that the vandalizer will stop. :) If he doesn't I will notify you.

I will try to keep up with the rules, new here.

Sorry for the inconvenience

Best regards

Red Avenged (talk) 16:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Red AvengedRed Avenged (talk) 16:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Howard King (referee)

Hi. I see that you have attempted to discuss your content disagreement on the article's Talk page (thanks for that), but your opponent, User:95.95.92.177, has not and has continued the edit-war. So this is just to let you know that I have filed an edit-war report against them (but not against you). You can find it at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:11, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]