Jump to content

User talk:RayScript/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Wiggins (data scientist) has been accepted

Chris Wiggins (data scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kr00k has been accepted

Kr00k, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 17:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Text-to-9-1-1 (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Government websites are not treated as independent sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiAviator (talk) 03:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, RayScript! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiAviator (talk) 03:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Text-to-9-1-1 has been accepted

Text-to-9-1-1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 10:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BookBub (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KartikeyaS (talk) 07:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: High-touch has been accepted

High-touch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Willowbrook State School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Price (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Gravity Payments. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There was previously an article on Dan Price. After a dispute, it was stubbed down to a redirect to Gravity Payments and has been create-protected by administrator User:EdJohnston. This draft is essentially the same as the deleted article and so is not considered to be notable. In order to have an article accepted, either this draft should be expanded, or consensus should be obtained that Dan Price is notable. One possible way to obtain consensus would be a Redirect for Discussion to request that the current redirect be replaced by an article. Do not resubmit this draft without discussing with the deleting administrator or another administrator or the community.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
You wrote {{WP:BIO1E}} twice. You probably didn't preview, or you would have realized that you should have done [[WP:BIO1E]]. Because you put the policy reference in curly braces rather than in square brackets, you transcluded the policy onto the discussion page, twice. I know that you didn't do it on purpose. Don't do it again; of course you won't do it again. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, RayScript, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi RayScript! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:21, Friday, April 3, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi RayScript! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:24, Friday, April 3, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi RayScript! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:30, Friday, April 3, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Nomination of TaxHawk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TaxHawk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TaxHawk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Pez company logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Pez company logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:01, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Pez company logo.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Andrew nyr (talk) 19:07, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Solutions Journalism Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Bornstein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TaxHawk logo.svg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TaxHawk logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregory Dees (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Coverage comes from sources closely related to the subject .We would need to see secondary coverage of the subject to fully demonstrate notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 02:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregory Dees has been accepted

Gregory Dees, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 10:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

reFill

Hi. I notice you use reFill. Whilst this is a really useful tool, it is not foolproof. The script hasn't been updated since "deadurl=" was dropped in favour of "url-status=" so, on occasions, causes error messages to be thrown such as here and here. Additionally, it fails to add an archive-date where there is a url from archive.today, again causing errors such as here. Could I ask you to check for this when using reFill. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 10:32, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

@John B123: Thank you for the kind reminder and for fixing these issues. I will be careful in the future :) RayScript (talk) 16:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Art of Gathering: How We Meet and Why It Matters (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The NYT article is most an interview and thus considered primary and not very useful in establishing notability. Showing some additional reviews in reliable, notable sources would help.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 02:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, RayScript! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 02:54, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Art of Gathering: How We Meet and Why It Matters (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JavaHurricane 13:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ansari X Prize logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ansari X Prize logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Evan Brandt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evan Brandt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Brandt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:30, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Susan Davis (author), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgetown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Évariste Régis Huc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caylus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hawaii Technology Development Corporation has been accepted

Hawaii Technology Development Corporation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

(t · c) buidhe 05:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Art of Gathering: How We Meet and Why It Matters

Hello, RayScript. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Art of Gathering: How We Meet and Why It Matters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:22, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Here's a smelly cup of coffee as thanks for creating smell training. Keep up the good content work! {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Smell training

Hello! Your submission of Smell training at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Alex2006 (talk) 08:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, RayScript

Thank you for creating Physophora hydrostatica.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello, Nice work on the article. If the taxobox doesn't work in future, it is because it has not been created. If you let me know in future I can help you out or if you would like to read more the help page is found at Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system/intro Best Regards

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 02:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, RayScript

Thank you for creating Athorybia lucida.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Again, Created the genus for this speciesbox to so any more species of this genus the speciesbox will work fine.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 02:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, RayScript

Thank you for creating Zancleopsidae.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Also created the taxonomy template for this one so the speciesbox displays correctly

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 03:51, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Smell training

On 5 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Smell training, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that smell training is being used to treat long-term loss of smell after COVID-19 infection? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Smell training. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Smell training), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 12:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pele Defense Fund (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, RayScript! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Stubs

Please check to make sure that the stub templates you add actually exist - see Exocoetus gibbosus and Lestrolepis japonica for cases where you've added nonexistent stub templates. Thanks. PamD 22:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

FragAttacks moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FragAttacks, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:FragAttacks has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:FragAttacks. Thanks! AntanO 02:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FragAttacks (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not really in in-depth coverage that's needed for these things. To be honest, unless it makes it to the mainstream media and/or gets widely exploited I'm not sure it's ever going to get the coverage.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 10:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, RayScript! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 10:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:FragAttacks

Information icon Hello, RayScript. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FragAttacks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt Vonnegut: Unstuck in Time has been accepted

Kurt Vonnegut: Unstuck in Time, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HenryTemplo (talk) 06:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History (American TV network), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Big Timber and Alone.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I reverted your recent edit at Geliyoo -- I'm not sure the red links you added meet notability. Consider WP:REDYES; as a general rule most articles shouldn't have red links, I think it makes most articles worse, particularly good articles (B class or above). If the pages should exist, better to create them first, then add the links. Happy to discuss further, just wanted to let you know my reasoning. Caleb Stanford (talk) 03:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BirdLife International Logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BirdLife International Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florida Digital Service has been accepted

Florida Digital Service, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

X (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Article submission

Hi, I wrote this article and could not submit because my account is new. Could you help review/edit and submit it? Thanks https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pro-Palestine_Activism_at_Radboud_University_Nijmegen 185.107.44.168 (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Please sign in (not editing with IP) so you can get responses from me. Thanks for reaching out though, it's a good idea (I know the rejections here can be rough)! I'm not so sure about the rule S0091 is citing. Honestly, I'm only a moderately experienced editor and this is a bit out of my knowledge area. Maybe @CommunityNotesContributor could provide some guidance on this situation. Is it okay for someone that meets the extended confirmed status to edit this and continue to resubmit the draft? Or if CommunityNotesContributor can submit a review of what should be fixed to make it ready to move out of draft that would be super helpful too. RayScript (talk) 11:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
The rule S0091 is citing is in reference to WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, by the looks of it that shouldn't be an issue but would need to look into it further (unfortunately my Dutch is very limited though). Anyone can edit a draft per WP:DRAFT, so if you are able to improve it I'd be happy to assist. I'll look at doing a review for you if you're willing to work on it. If you can bring it up to the standards of 2024 University of Amsterdam pro-Palestinian campus occupation it should have no problem. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
To correct myself, the initial rejection was due to WP:ARBECR. So if you are an WP:XC then you can improve article and resubmit. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Wikilinking typos

Hello! I saw this 2020 edit and noticed it added piped wiki-links to the typos 'World War 1' and 'Pensylvannia' when it would have been better to fix them. (fixed now)

It's obviously an old edit from when you had just over 500 edits, and honestly a rather trivial matter, so sorry to bother you if you already were already aware of that. Retro (talk | contribs) 13:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RayScript/Archive_1&oldid=1264102150"