User talk:Raul.rodr
March 2017
[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Charles Del Campo, from its old location at User:Raul.rodr/sandbox/Charles Del Campo. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit]The sandbox page you have created is, with very minor alterations, a copy of the content of the web page https://publicacionesrebeldes.wordpress.com/2014/08/08/charles-del-campo. Wikipedia's copyright policy is that we do not accept content copied from other sources unless we have proof that the copyright owner has either released it into the public domain or licensed it for free reuse in terms compatible with Wikipedia's licensing terms. The page will therefore be deleted from Wikipedia. If you are the copyright owner I could link you to instructions on how to release content for reuse on Wikipedia, but doing so would be a waste of your time, as the content would not be acceptable as a Wikipedia article for other reasons, particularly because it is not written from a neutral point of view as required by Wikipedia policy, but is clearly written to indicate support for Charles Del Campo and to promote his reputation.
You are free to create a new draft about Charles Del Campo, writing in your own words rather than copying from another source and being careful to write in a neutral way, but in my experience new editors who come to Wikipedia to post a laudatory or promotional article about someone they have a high regard for often have a difficult and frustrating time trying to write a whole new article in line with policies and guidelines which they have no experience of, and which they have to try to learn while they go along. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
I have permission from Mr. del Campo copy and modify his story.
Raul.rodr, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Raul.rodr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC) |
Your draft article, Draft:Charles Del Campo
[edit]
Hello, Raul.rodr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charles Del Campo".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 14:52, 11 December 2017 (UTC)