User talk:Ranjith KonGu

Topic banned

For your inability to collaborate with other editors and continuing to push your opinion on to caste articles including after being warned about community imposed sanctions related to the topic., I have decided, in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the terms of this community discussion, to impose the following sanction on you:

Topic banned from any edits relating to castes or social groups of south Asia across any namespace.

This sanction has been logged at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction to the community at the administrators' noticeboard and to the Arbitration Committee. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. —SpacemanSpiff 06:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violation of topic ban, continuous disruptive editing, WP:GS/Caste. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 06:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey iam not doing anything wrong why you blocked me?Unblock me?I dont know fully about wikipedia the mistake is happened mistakely unblock me.

Ranjith KonGu (talk) 06:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ranjith KonGu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey iam not doing anything wrong why you blocked me?Unblock me?I dont know fully about wikipedia the mistake is happened mistakely unblock me.

Ranjith KonGu (talk) 06:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your talk page is full of warnings. You chose to ignore them, and hence the block. Max Semenik (talk) 06:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ranjith KonGu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock me Someone irritate my caste so i changed that thats all.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ranjith KonGu (talk) 07:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the active sanctions/block/unblock notices. Do not remove them again or your talk page access will also be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 07:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I am New to wikipedia so mistakely i removed that sorry for the in convenience unblock me.Ranjith KonGu (talk) 07:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ranjith KonGu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey admin unblock me i promise im not doing anything wrong i dont know about wikipedia so only the mistake will be happened.Ranjith KonGu (talk) 08:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are banned from posting anything, anywhere, relating to castes or social groups. This applies even if another veditor posts something with which you do not agree. Do you understand this? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.