User talk:Rani300

Welcome

*Hello Rani300:* Welcome to the English version of Wikipedia
Thanks to you for your active participation in this project, especially for your efforts on Zarine Khan. We hope that you will stay to contribute more and that you will continue to find the collaboration process enjoyable.
Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that began in 2001 and is free for anyone to use and edit under certain guidelines and principles that all users should understand and adhere to. These principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information.
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.	Help. How to get help.
	Tutorial. This tutorial is a basic guide to editing.	Your user pages and your sandbox. How to experiment and edit in your user space.
	Mentoring program. Request help in your first steps of editing.	How to start a page. Help on creating your first article.
	Things to avoid. How to avoid common errors and mistakes.	Style Guide. How to write in an acceptable style.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.	Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance	Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.

This is your Talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss things with them. At the end of your messages you should always enter your signature by signing with four ~~~~ or by pressing the button in the editor shown here in the picture. By the way, it is not necessary to sign edits that you make in the articles themselves as those messages will be deleted. My name is DBigXray. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, post `{{helpme\|your question}}` on your talk page (this page), someone will quickly come up and attend to your query. And also, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist. Good Luck Editing!

DBig Xray 20:52, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Zarine Khan was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DBig Xray 20:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aasman (2013) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aasman (2013) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aasman (2013) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Man way 17:57, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Aasman (2013). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 02:42, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saeeda Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saeeda Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 02:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of KRS Productions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on KRS Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Keystoner idin (speak) 01:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jacqueline_Fernandez&diff=next&oldid=502267918, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. For what it's worth, adjusting the date shown in the protection template does not actually affect the length of time the article is protected--messing with this date doesn't actually accomplish anything. Please just stop, okay? j⚛e decker ^talk 03:39, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jacqueline Fernandez. Jprg1966 ^(talk) 04:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the text of the page protection is not considered constructive editing. You have been warned amply, including by an administrator, that your actions are disruptive. I was alerted by another editor that you changed the text again, and I would have reported your name at WP:AIV if I had seen the message earlier. I have decided not to do that, since blocks are preventative, not punitive. But there is no possible way for you to claim ignorance of the rules in the future. --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 04:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Desi Girlz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Desi Girlz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desi Girlz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —SpacemanSpiff 06:56, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raajneeti 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raajneeti 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raajneeti 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. heather walls (talk) 10:22, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of KRS Productions

A tag has been placed on KRS Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AllyD (talk) 20:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Emma Watson has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 14:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is your final warning, if you create any more hoaxes or do any disruptive moves, you will be blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 02:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Definition of Fear (film)

The article Definition of Fear (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM, as a movie that has not yet started principal photography.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 05:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cocktail (2012 film), you may be blocked from editing. --Zeeyanketu ✉ 17:55, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Yash Chopra Romance listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A Yash Chopra Romance. Since you had some involvement with the A Yash Chopra Romance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). BollyJeff | talk 19:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chamku's Angels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Abraham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chamku's Angels

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chamku's Angels, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BOVINEBOY2008 11:54, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jai Ramji

The article Jai Ramji has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

per WP:NFF, filming has not commenced and does not have sufficient coverage

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 18:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ram Leela (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images uploads of Race 2

Hi Rani300

Stop uploading non-free images of Race 2 posters continuously. It should be used as fair-us rationale. Read images policy WP:FUR --Jenith (talk) 05:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deceived (2012)

The article Deceived (2012) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that the film meets the notability guidelines for inclusion; no supporting references given for the claims made in the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §FreeRangeFrog 18:39, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Honey Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deceived (2012) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deceived (2012) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deceived (2012) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. §FreeRangeFrog 00:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Deceived (2012). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 01:08, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Jacqueline Fernandez, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Torreslfchero (talk) 13:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Happy New Year (2013 film)

The article Happy New Year (2013 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no third party reliable sources indication project has entered principal photography, fails WP:NFILM

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:29, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Happy New Year (2013 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Happy New Year (2013 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy New Year (2013 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Fernandez birthday

You really think desimartini is a more reliable source the Times of India? And the facebook page is not hers, but a fans; again, not reliable. Please try to work it out on the talk page before making big changes like that. We need good quality sources for biographies. BollyJeff | talk 21:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep changing the bday without discussing first on the talk page? Do you think no one will notice? Seriously?? Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, not "whoever edits last wins." BollyJeff | talk 13:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to change Fernandez birthdate info I will have to take action. Hope you can respect that there are no reliable sources for 11 August. Until you or another user find reliable sources for that then 2 June stays. Basically all sources I can find points to 2 June. --BabbaQ (talk) 17:56, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sajid Khan's Untitled Next

The article Sajid Khan's Untitled Next has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No filming begins yet,Nothing is sure and same reference is used many times.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---zeeyanketu ^discutez 05:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sajid Khan's Untitled Next for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sajid Khan's Untitled Next is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajid Khan's Untitled Next until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at WP:NFF, which explains the very limited circumstances under which we can have an article about a film that has not yet been released; it certainly isn't met if the project doesn't even have a name. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:25, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]