Jump to content

User talk:Rager7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


New discussion

[edit]

Hello, editor, I noticed you recently participated in a discussion of a requested move for the article Brian Thompson (businessman). There is a new discussion open at Talk:Brian Thompson (businessman) § Killing of Brian Thompson, and I'd like to invite you to participate. Thank you. BarntToust 19:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Order

[edit]

Hello. I discovered that in a number of articles you've moved the short description tag that was at the beginning of an article's code to a position after other tags and attributed your edit to MOS:FIRST. You ought to reread that: it's about the first sentence of the article, not about the tags that precede it. If you look further up that page, at MOS:LEADORDER, and also at the main page about article organization, WP:ORDER, you'll see that the short description should be the very first tag in an article. (In this case, you left the short description tag at the top but you incorrectly moved the first sentence above the infobox.) For that reason, I'm restoring the correct order in those articles. Largoplazo (talk) 11:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So the tags go first when structuring a Wikipedia article? If so, does MOS:FIRST occur after tags or it is a completely different subject altogether? Rager7 (talk) 17:20, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's spelled out in the two places I showed you. MOS:FIRST gives guidance for the first sentence of the article, the beginning of the introductory text. MOS:LEADORDER lists all the types of tags that precede the introductory text, in order. Largoplazo (talk) 20:03, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, thanks for clarifying. My bad, that I didn't formatted properly. Rager7 (talk) 22:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Path to Paradise: The Untold Story of the World Trade Center Bombing has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. Diannaa (talk) 17:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then as I mentioned before if you can add a plot summary in your own words. Then it would be gladly appreciated. Rager7 (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to do that, because I've never seen the film. Diannaa (talk) 02:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well then someone else that watched the film will. Rager7 (talk) 03:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The inter-Trump era

[edit]

Hello, Rager7

I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect The inter-Trump era, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 8 § The inter-Trump era.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to meet you too and I'm curious as to your thoughts of wanting to delete the redirect. Rager7 (talk) 00:54, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The inter-Trump years

[edit]

Hello, Rager7

I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect The inter-Trump years, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 8 § The inter-Trump years.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I'm open to any reasoning of wanted deletion. Rager7 (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]