User talk:Quiggers1P/archives/2010/March
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Quiggers1P. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Twinkle Again
Hi, sorry took so long to get back to you, been busy recently, I'm using BT Yahoo browser and I'm on Windows XP operating system. Quiggers1P (talk) 17:46, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm. Interesting. It should work. File a report at Bugzilla? Samwb123T (R)-C-E 00:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
The article Modern Gold Rush has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unencyclopedic essay/neologism.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. tedder (talk) 18:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Modern Gold Rush
I have nominated Modern Gold Rush, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Gold Rush. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:35, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Modern Gold Rush
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Modern Gold Rush. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Gold Rush. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 21 March 2010 (UTC)