User talk:Pukerua
Welcome, but ... I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Core Practice, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Core Practice. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 08:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
ITIL/eTOM
[edit]Will you back me on the ITIL/eTOM issue? Charles T. Betz 19:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
ITIL talk page RFC
[edit]After the previous RFC on external links you stated "If I'd been here in time I'd have added my vote to drop both" and I notice that you have yet to comment on the current RFC which has been running for 8 days so far. This is a friendly highlight for you in case you missed it.—Ash (talk) 15:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)