User talk:Prof02

Notice: I have archived your talk page. You have shown no interest in communicating civilly, but prefer to ramble on pretentiously to yourself, making both broad and specific personal attacks against Bishonen. You were given many chances to discuss any issues in a civil fashion; you failed utterly to do so. I have extended your block to indefinate. Make another personal attack and I will remove it and protect this page. I leave it unprotected for now for the sole reason that even persistant trolls occasionally see the light; and such may happen with you. Should you desire to make appropriate apologies and mend your ways, post your intentions here. KillerChihuahua^?!? 00:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Note. Prof02 reinstated and added to this attack page which had been blanked by administrator KillerChihuahua. I have now reverted to KC's version and protected the page. You were warned that this would happen. Please use the Wikipedia e-mail feature for communication. Bishonen | talk 10:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
- Note2 Support this measure, which I would have done myself had I seen it first. Prof, archving is not "hiding" things, and you reinstated your previous attacks and added to them. Appeals to Jimbo are wiki-lawyering; disruption is indeed what you have been doing and your block is completely valid. KillerChihuahua^?!? 18:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wagner listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wagner. Since you had some involvement with the Wagner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jax 0677 (talk) 18:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Masovianus

The article Alexander Masovianus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -Crossroads- (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]