User talk:ProDeletionist

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, ProDeletionist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AmiDaniel (Talk) 05:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Felhound

Can you please explain your reasoning for nominating Felhound for deletion either on its AfD page or talk page? I disagree that this article should be deleted, and other than your being "ProDeletionist," I simply don't understand your rationale in nominating it. Pivotal characters in notable computer games are generally considered notable under WP:BIO, given that the notability has been asserted. Please respond on my talk page or create an entry at WP:AfD for it, or I will remove the AfD notice. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:01, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what on earth you are doing, but I'm tempted to accuse you of vandalism. Every contribution you've ever made (since you became a user 6 minutes ago) has been to post AfD notices on clearly notable articles. Read over Wikipedia:Deletion and I urge you to stop at once or I will report you to WP:AIV. You cannot nominate an article for deletion without providing a clear reason. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:08, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

You have nominated many articles for deletion within the past five minutes. Please justify your actions so that others will know why you are nominating these articles. Pepsidrinka 06:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating for deletion

Theres a protocol that should be followed for nominating an article for deletion. This is how a page should be deleted. And please nominate a deletion only if it is non-sense, or not notable enough, or somehow unworthy. And always give a rationale why you nominated an article for deletion. Your recent nomination Film Synchronizer, doesn't provide any rationale on the deletions voting page. And it seems to be an informative enough article. I am reverting your edits. As of its current stage it doesn't provide much information, but that doesn't make it qualified for a deletion. Most articles start out like this, and expand over time. Such articles should not be deleted, they should be expanded.

For nominating other articles in future, please follow the three steps, which has been mentioned eralier as well.

Feel free to contact me for further information. Have a nice stay in Wikipedia. --Soumyasch 06:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

Pepsidrinka 06:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Vandalizing!!!

I have reported you to WP:AIV as your actions are clearly vandalism. I'm going to revert all of your AfD tags immediately. I hope you eventually will decide to stop destroying the hard work of others and will some day contribute positively to Wikipedia. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:15, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]