User talk:Priyanjali singh

Priyanjali singh, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Priyanjali singh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Priyanjali singh, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ravensfire (talk) 17:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Undisclosed payment template

Please explain the reason for multiple addition of “undisclosed payment” templates to articles you believe aren’t notable. That template should only be used when their are strong claims that the author is paid. Megan☺️ ^{Talk to the monster} 16:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second this concern, plus on several of the articles you've nominated for deletion you don't appear to have done any WP:BEFORE checking. At least one your nominating statement says no reliable sources when there are several in the article that are reliable. Ravensfire (talk) 21:04, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am following the user for last many days. The user has created many articles for which he got paid. For example Lina Ashar, Kangaroo Kids International Preschool, Kangaroo Kids Education Limited. Priyanjali singh (talk) 11:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? you stated you have been following me since the last few days but the articles you pointed to were created back in 2018. Have you checked how many times they were edited and who added what? Your behavior clearly suggests that you're not here to build an encyclopedia and your motive is something else. @Ab207:@Synoman Barris:@Ravensfire: this user nominated ten of my articles and several others for deletion in a matter of minutes putting a similar comment "non notable, Fails GNG" I doubt if she even bothered to check their references, let alone performing a BEFORE search. She is accusing others but has yet to declare her paid editing. It sounds as if a guilty person accusing the innocent.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Can you substantiate why this article was tagged as undisclosed paid? --Ab207 (talk) 13:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the contribution on this article most of the edits are from ip addresses or users are blocked or unblocked after being blocked. For example; User:B.Bhargava Teja, User talk:Vraxxthelord, User talk:Saichaitanya4496. Priyanjali singh (talk) 14:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Priyanjali singh, if you want to accuse someone of being a WP:SOCKPUPPET to evade a block, you need to do that on WP:SPI and request an investigation. If you aren't going to do that, then you need to STOP with the accusations. Vague hand-waving like you've been doing is not acceptable and needs to stop. You may very well be correct, but you must go through the right steps. If you have confidential evidence, you can contact WP:ARBCOM or follow the suggestions in WP:PAID. Ravensfire (talk) 14:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Priyanjali singh, per concerns raised by Umakant Bhalerao, I have removed the “undisclosed payment template” from the above article. Unless you have strong evidence on why you think the editor is being paid, don’t reinstate those templates. Also please stop harassing another editor. Best regards Megan☺️ ^{Talk to the monster} 14:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Synoman Barris, Umakant has created three articles of same organization Kangaroo Kids Education Limited, Kangaroo Kids International Preschool and Lina Ashar who is the owner of these schools. It clearly indicates close connection and UDP. Priyanjali singh (talk) 13:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So just looking at three articles you figured out that they were paid ones? there are many editors out there who have created more than one article of same organization, so do you mean they all have been paid? so stop your accusation. Your whole argument is so weak, baseless, and based on assumptions. If you believe those were paid articles just report me. Now lets come back to the questions I have asked many times and again asking you How you nominated more than ten articles for deletion in a matter of minutes? did you check their sources carefully and did a BEFORE search before tagging them? Secondly, why you still haven't declared your paid editing despite being asked several times? I also observed that on 28 August you took part in 10 afd discussions putting similar comment "Per nom" and the average time you spent on each article was hardly 3 minutes. Did you really check their sources and did a BEFORE search before casting your !votes?--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 20:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Priyanjali singh, contribution by IPs and users who may have been blocked afterward for various reasons does not make the article paid. And if you see closely, the purpose of the template to draw other editor's attention for clean up. Apart from basic information, there's nothing much in the article that requires clean up. I have removed the template now, and you are free to discuss any issues on the talk page.

Regarding mass deletion nominations. I would advise you to use deletion as a last resort and not single out any user. Its also recommend to go through this essay once. Regards --Ab207 (talk) 19:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your personal attacks

Can you explain as to why you nominated ten of my articles for deletion and tagged them as UPE without evidence? This is clearly a personal attack and an unacceptable thing to do on Wikipedia. You must provide an explanation for this or continuing doing so will be considered vandalism and may result in a block. I have noticed you tagged several other pages that were notable for deletion in a matter of minutes. You must check all references carefully and do some online research before taking your actions--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 20:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My dear friend. This is not a personal attack. I do not have any personal issue with you. I have strong vibration of paid editing. And the articles i have nominated feels like promotional and somewhere not eligible or notable as per Wikipedia guidelines. I would request you to please co-operate in deletion discussion and let the other editors decide.Priyanjali singh (talk) 11:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

don't leap in the dark and provide evidence. You can not just keep adding paid editing tags just because you think articles were promotional or based on your assumptions. You could have used other templates or copy edited those articles to address promotional concerns. You don't seem to be here to build an encyclopedia and your editing pattern says it all. In fact, you have been asked quite a few to declare your paid editing and you started accusing others? Your allegations smack of bad faith and bit. Please familiarize yourself with the concept WP:ADVOCACY and stop doing that or it may result in a block--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 13:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My Dear friend Uma, Please do not violent. I am aware with the Wikipedia Advocacy and Policies. If I am wrong anywhere you may block surely. I would suggest you to disclose your paid editing on your user page. Priyanjali singh (talk) 14:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your accusations are unfounded and reckless. Please don't get away from the point and answer how you nominated more than ten articles within a few moments? Did you check all the sources carefully and perform a BEFORE checking before tagging them for deletion? and Why you still have not confessed your paid editing in spite of being asked so many times?--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Uma, You have created three articles of same organization Kangaroo Kids Education Limited, Kangaroo Kids International Preschool and Lina Ashar who is the owner. It clearly indicates close connection and UDP. You must disclose your paid editing. Priyanjali singh (talk) 13:43, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Priyanjali singh, take it to WP:COIN. Ravensfire (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So just looking at three articles you figured out that they were paid ones? there are many editors out there who have created more than one article of same organization, so do you mean they all have been paid? stop your accusation. Your whole argument is so weak, baseless, and based on assumptions. If you believe those were paid articles just report me. Now lets come back to the questions I have asked many times and again asking you How you nominated more than ten articles for deletion in a matter of minutes? did you check their sources carefully and did a BEFORE search before tagging them? Secondly, why you still haven't declared your paid editing despite being asked several times?--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 20:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 20:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi can you edit it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montazur_Rahman_Akbar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.246.200.65 (talk) 10:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shabnam (Indian actress)

Priyanjali ji what can I do if any reliable source not published a single article for an actress who worked in more than 50 Bollywood movies with star cast like Dharmendra and Manoj kumar, I understand wikipedia policy but its not my first Article for wikipedia. And plz help me to improve this article. Because there is an another Bangladeshi actress with the same name. Imdb information for both actress is mashed in a same page because of confusion of the same name. Dedha9 (talk) 16:06, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Priyanjali singh! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can a user delete his own talk page?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Khesanio Hall in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GiantSnowman (talk • contribs)

Low value / no value edits

Slow down! Editing Wikipedia is a not a race. Your edit history shows you making many low value / no value, and in fact negative value small edits very quickly, and apparently without taking care in how you edit. As GiantSnowman pointed out above, your edit summaries are not accurate and you have continued using inaccurate summaries. This is not a grammar related. Furthermore, the removal of the blank line is actually contrary to WP:STUBSPACING which states that there should be two blank lines there. Removing two spaces after a period as you did here is utterly pointless and of no value. Per MOS:PUNCTSPACE, "Some editors type two spaces after a period/full stop; these are condensed to one when the page is rendered, so what the reader sees is not affected" (emphasis added). You are also adding short descriptions by mindlessly cutting and pasting from the article without ensuring what you added makes any sense. Wikipedia:Short description describes what a short description should be. I ask you, what is the scope of the topic that is described by "Pennsylvania in July from 1987 until 2011". If faced with this, I'd think it was about the month of July in in the state of Pennsylvania over a period of years from 1987 to 2011. I would never have guessed that it as a bicycle race.

There's nothing wrong with being a WikiGnome, but you do need to think about what you are doing and be familiar with the appropriate guidelines and policies. -- Whpq (talk) 17:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Kenan Crnkïc

Hello Priyanjali singh, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kenan Crnkïc, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I cannot find the reference deletion discussion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]