User talk:PrecociousPeach
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, PrecociousPeach, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Tip of the day
- The Signpost, our illustrated monthly newspaper.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gderrin (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
PrecociousPeach, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi PrecociousPeach! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:08, 17 January 2020 (UTC) |
Regarding sources
[edit]Hi PrecociousPeach, I saw your recent additions to Cheetah and Ocelot. While there is no problem in trying to improve the coverage of articles, I would request you to go through WP: Verifiability to understand which sources are truly reliable in the context of an encyclopedia like Wikipedia. Sources you had used most probably don't fit the bill, and zoology articles typically rely on books, peer-reviewed journal articles and reports for coverage. This is not to discourage you from editing, if you have any queries feel free to ping me :) Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:09, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- alright I'll take a look at that, thank you for the heads up.PrecociousPeach (talk) 21:18, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Wool Carder Bees
[edit]Hello Precocious Peach,
Saw the note on your user page about Wool Carder Bees, so here are a couple of tips.
- It's easier to get into the swing of things by editing pages rather than writing an article from scratch. There are a few articles already that you might like to add to, including Anthidium manicatum, Megachilidae and the disambiguation page "Carder bee".
- Don't be discouraged by the criticism of your earlier efforts.
- It looks like some insect experts have been busy on the bee pages, but I noticed that the Bombus sylvarum article is poorly referenced. There are a couple of good on-line sources that could be used to improve the article, including this one and this, both of which look like reliable sources to me. Gderrin (talk) 06:47, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- Yes the undertaking of a whole article from scratch seemed pretty intimidating, I will practice editing for now until I'm more comfortable.
Thanks for the tips.PrecociousPeach (talk) 21:18, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 01:12, 20 February 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Charlie Kirk
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you that the Charlie Kirk page has received protection for two months. Happing editing!--Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 06:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Oh thank you for doing that! Do semi protections usually last for 2 months? I wonder why it isn't permanent? Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d. -- PrecociousPeach (talk) 23:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- @PrecociousPeach: The length of time for page protections comes at the discretion of the admin who issues the protection. Since the Charlie Kirk page received protection twice before: [1] (each protection lasted 1 week), the admin this time bumped it up to 2 months. I don't believe there is enough vandalism to warrant indefinite protection at this point. However, once this current protection expires, I suspect the vandalism will continue so I will be more than happy to again request page protection. My guess is that next time the admin will issue protection lasting for 6 months to a year. Please see this guide if you have other questions, or feel free to ask me questions on my talk page
. Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- @PrecociousPeach: The length of time for page protections comes at the discretion of the admin who issues the protection. Since the Charlie Kirk page received protection twice before: [1] (each protection lasted 1 week), the admin this time bumped it up to 2 months. I don't believe there is enough vandalism to warrant indefinite protection at this point. However, once this current protection expires, I suspect the vandalism will continue so I will be more than happy to again request page protection. My guess is that next time the admin will issue protection lasting for 6 months to a year. Please see this guide if you have other questions, or feel free to ask me questions on my talk page
Important Notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.