User talk:Pomniismywife

Welcome!

Hello, Pomniismywife, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 20:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well this was a sweet surprise lol I wasn’t expecting this but thanks for the warm welcoming, im still trying to get the hang of coding stuff here, I have been learning step by step tutorials since I used to use scratch a lot lol Pomniismywife (talk) 02:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hysteria! (TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop. Bring these to the talk page. LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 15:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I learnt my lesson and payed for it, won’t happen again, sorry Pomniismywife (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bro what? I thought we already sorted this out, if you look at my last few edits you can see I’m actually contributing to many articles, I even have included sources to help Pomniismywife (talk) 06:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I love how you continue to ignore me, don’t care if this isn’t a ‘chatroom’, you wanna talk about poor sourcing, how about that ‘ser amantio di nicolao’ guy who has put ‘science fiction horror’ in the categories for anaconda, the descent, etc. and that’s only touching the surface, you are blocking me over a situation that was already sorted out literally a week ago Pomniismywife (talk) 02:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You gonna answer me or just continue to be a one sided person Pomniismywife (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/1249062229, for example, is completely unsourced. If you want to be unblocked, make an unblock request. The instructions are above. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright fine I’ll make an appeal, but didn’t you see the trailer? Looked very horror-esque to me Pomniismywife (talk) 02:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I love how you ignored me because I made a point that you know is true, you’ve been stalking my account for WEEKS, waiting for me to make one small mistake just to block me for a week, do you know how narcissistic that really is Pomniismywife (talk) 11:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know how many people have done the exact same thing as me though? This just felt like a personal target, I don’t think you could exactly block me for a week just for one accidental flaw that many others have also done, even the dude I mentioned before, but you won’t answer me so what’s the point, I don’t deserve this at all Pomniismywife (talk) 01:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I love how you ignored me because I made a point that you know is true, you’ve been stalking my account for WEEKS, waiting for me to make one small mistake just to block me for a week, do you know how narcissistic that really is Pomniismywife (talk) 11:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pomniismywife (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

falsely accused of vandalism when I was just trying to help a article, yes I should’ve included a source but I’ve seen many articles genres change without a source and be left untouched, block seems to be more about pride than ‘helping the community’Pomniismywife (talk) 11:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you are unwilling to take proper responsibility, I think the block should remain in place. If instead you are willing to commit to properly sourcing all genre changes or alternatively, refrain from all future genre changes, that would be a different matter. Yamla (talk) 11:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pomniismywife (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

prior to the edit I did for (companion, 2025 film) that got me blocked anyone who had seen the teaser trailer like me would’ve probably put ‘horror thriller’ just like I had, Infact the most recent edit on the article as of now has ‘american romance films’ as one of the categories and it hasn’t even been changed, idk bout you but if my edit was ‘vandalism’, shouldn’t this edit be one too?, another thing I wanna add to this is another user called ‘ser amantio di nicolao’ who is prone to making the same edit mistakes as me but hasn’t been corrected not even once, dude put ‘science fiction horror’ in films such as the descent and anaconda, and that’s only the two I’m gonna say because there’s tons of other mistakes he’s done, even someone put the genres ‘avant-garde’ and ‘horror’ for perfect blue and it already has a properly source but not for those two genres, yet it hasn’t been fixed, this just feels like a attack towards my account, I did one accidental mistake and I get blocked, this seems very unfair and one sidedPomniismywife (talk) 13:02, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not do as you were asked. There isn't really a pathway forward here otherwise. 331dot (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No part of that unblock request is appropriate. See WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:NOR. --Yamla (talk) 13:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Crow

Dear Pomniismywife does The Crow (1994) count as a horror film? 107.127.53.5 (talk) 14:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily, it’s definitely more of a gothic superhero film if anything Pomniismywife (talk) 06:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm JalenBarks. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Psychological drama, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Barks (Woof) 01:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bro what? Do I literally have to? Then why aren’t the other sources showing up then, it’s no secret that psychological drama is a more modernised misery lit though, and even so I suck at coding sources in articles so idk what to do Pomniismywife (talk) 01:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]