User talk:Polete 98

Welcome!

Hello, Polete 98, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Colla Joves Xiquets de Valls, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GregJackP Boomer! 01:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Colla Joves Xiquets de Valls

A tag has been placed on Colla Joves Xiquets de Valls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GregJackP Boomer! 01:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Club Egara

The article Club Egara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sports club that does not support claims of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 01:57, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

English names

Please see WP:ENGLISH. This is is the English language version of the encyclopedia and the policy is to English names with a reference to the original language name. --GraemeL ^(talk) 19:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ibiza. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Frietjes (talk) 19:54, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. I'll do this. -- Polete 98 (talk) 19:59, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Polete 98. You have new messages at GraemeL's talk page.
Message added 20:00, 29 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

GraemeL ^(talk) 20:00, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied to you again on my talk page.

By the way, you can remove the edit warring warning above. No need to have it cluttering up your page once you've seen it. --GraemeL ^(talk) 20:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]