User talk:Pleasedontdeletemyedits
Welcome
[edit]
|
When adding dimensions to (eg) islands
[edit]Please have a look at {{Convert}}, which, once learned, aids you substantially. If you can't work out what to do, place {{helpme}} here with the question you need to ask below it. A very nice editor will drop by to offer help. Fiddle Faddle 18:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 02:29, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Please stop
[edit]Look, you're adding unreferenced material to tons of articles. That's not cool. WP:V is at the core of everything we do here. You are either making stuff up or are being lazy and not adding the source(s) you are getting this info from. Please either stop adding this stuff or start adding your source(s).
If you need help on how to add citations, please take a look at Help:Referencing for beginners.
Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 03:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- If life is too short[1]for you to use edit summaries and cite reliable sources, you shouldn't be editing here and you will be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 03:37, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 03:39, 29 December 2013 (UTC)- Note, Pleasedontdeletemyedits: Because of the intemperate language and personal attacks in your last post, your talk page access has been withdrawn. However, I am interested to know the source of the information that you were adding to the articles, as it appears to be precise and likely correct. You can email me this information, if you are willing to link an email address to this account. Unfortunately, there have been a fair number of occasions where comparatively inactive editors have come to Wikipedia and made what might on the surface look to be reasonable edits of "fact" information, which turned out to be intentional misinformation, so the project has become much less flexible about modifying such information without a source. Risker (talk) 04:07, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Says everything there is to say about this site don't it? The above named American c.u.n.t. who saw fit to provoke you by removing correct information (because they never assumed good faith or had the mental processes to deal with other human beings) quit just weeks later after being called on the fact they were a power-crazed c.u.n.t. Classic innit. You can see they were on the final legs of the power trip when it gave you a life ban - just for adding the correct information. Sucks don't it. Still better to know now than waste a lifetime on here. 86.166.107.112 (talk) 17:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)