User talk:Planetjanet

Speedy deletion of Lisa Brown (goon)

A tag has been placed on Lisa Brown (goon), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Menti fisto 17:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lisa Brown (goon), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Woody (talk) 17:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Neon Icon because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! STATic message me! 01:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Planetjanet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dale Wilson

Hi Planetjanet, I reverted your edit to Dale Wilson because the name is never used in Low Tier God. I'm guessing that Low Tier God is his real name, but the article never says so. Leschnei (talk) 14:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're guessing that ‘Low Tier God’ is his real name? Planetjanet (talk) 03:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The name Wilson suddenly appeared at the end of the article. It wasn't entirely clear who it referred to. And people have changed their names to stranger things than 'Low Tier God'.

Leschnei (talk) 20:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why I added him to the disambiguation page. His birth name is widely used in the Fighting Game Community, so I don't see the point of removing it from the page. If a user comes across a reference to the basketball player formerly known as Ron Artest, should they not be redirected by Wikipedia's system (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Artest&redirect=no) in this way? Planetjanet (talk) 21:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The difference is that 'Ron Artest' is mentioned in the article, so it's logical to redirect Ron Artest to Metta Sandiford-Artest. If Low Tier God's real name is Dale Wilson, why no say so in the article. Then it would be logical to list it on Dale Wilson. As the article is worded now, 'Wilson' just appeaers, with no explanation, in the middle of the article. And 'Dale' is never mentioned. I'm not making the edit to Low Tier God myself because I have no idea what his birth name is. Leschnei (talk) 23:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are major Spanish newspapers accepted as reliable sources for BLPs on the English Wikipedia? Because I may have found a source for his birth name. Planetjanet (talk) 02:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I discussed this with administrator Cullen328 here, I will be updating his biography and the disambiguation page tonight with the appropriate reference. Planetjanet (talk) 23:27, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that you found a reference for this - could you please use the reference in the article but remove it from Dale Wilson? Per the guidelines for disambiguation pages (WP:DABREF), references should be included in articles, where they support the actual content. Thanks, Leschnei (talk) 23:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Planetjanet (talk) 01:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gusano and related topics

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 63.155.103.206 (talk) 09:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my warning at WP:AN3.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]