User talk:Plane'n Boom1

April 2021

Hello, I'm Acroterion. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Acroterion (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FedEx Express Flight 87 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FedEx Express Flight 87 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FedEx Express Flight 87 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 21:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Air Astana Flight 1388 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air Astana Flight 1388 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Astana Flight 1388 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 21:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do I fix the page? Plane'n Boom1 (talk) 21:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Air Lines Flight 9877 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Delta Air Lines Flight 9877, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before submitting your draft for pre-publishing review, please ensure that material copied or closely paraphrased from external source(s) is removed and replaced with your own text. Also, that all material statements are supported by reference to multiple reliable secondary sources. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from public domain sources requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Omega Aerial Refueling Services Flight 70. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 05:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SmartLynx Airlines Estonia Flight 9001

The article SmartLynx Airlines Estonia Flight 9001 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS. Minor accident (no fatalities) during a training flight, no lasting impact.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, if Loganair 6780 and Air Astana 1388 remain on wiki, i think this, a more serious accident, should stay up It's pretty fascinating Plane'n Boom1 (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you reconsider please? Plane'n Boom1 (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SmartLynx Airlines Estonia Flight 9001 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SmartLynx Airlines Estonia Flight 9001 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartLynx Airlines Estonia Flight 9001 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 14:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of accidents and incidents involving airliners in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trinity Bay and American Airlines Flight 1. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flightline Flight 101 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Flightline Flight 101, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. It also needs article text. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Flightline Flight 101 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Flightline Flight 101. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Plane'n Boom1

Thank you for creating Formosa Airlines Flight 7623.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:56, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Plane'n Boom1

Thank you for creating Delta Air Lines Flight 9877.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Plane'n Boom1

Thank you for creating Omega Aerial Refueling Services Flight 70.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:36, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of VASP Flight 210 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VASP Flight 210 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VASP Flight 210 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Delta Air Lines Flight 9877

Hello, Plane'n Boom1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Delta Air Lines Flight 9877, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Air Tahoma Flight 587

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Air Tahoma Flight 587 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Tahoma Flight 587. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aeroflot Flight A-53 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aeroflot Flight A-53 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroflot Flight A-53 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aviationwikiflight (talk) 07:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]