User talk:Phantomsteve/Archives/2019/August

Archives

Deletion of the Monito.com Article

Dear Phontomsteve,

I hope this message finds you well. I'm reaching out about a page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monito.com that you deleted on Dec 22, 2018. Reaching out today is a humble attempt at making you change your mind.

Disclaimer: I'm the founder of the startup owning the website www.monito.com and transparent about it.

Here's why I believe that a Wikipedia article about Monito.com would benefit the community: 1. Monito is a reputable company, used by millions of users around the world which has partnered with the Swiss Government & the International Organization for Migration (UN Agency) and has received investments from (among others), a best selling author and a [traded company].

2. We're recognized as experts in our field and quoted as an expert in the Money Transfer industry by various prestigious media outlets, including [Forbes], TechCrunch, Business Insider, Le Monde, Le Temps, 20 Minutes, Money International and the Swiss National Television (RTS). We're invited as keynote speakers at industry conferences, such as the International Money Transfer Conference, the Transparency in the Remittances Industry Conference at the Swiss Embassy in London and the Global Forum on Remittances.

3. People looking for Monito online or on Wikipedia are only served with the information about the Monito Island. As beautiful as it sounds, I think that the vast majority of people looking for information about Monito are looking for our company history, background and information.

I sincerely apologize if the first attempt to edit a page for Monito.com sounded self-promotional and I'm willing to hear from you how we can build a page that answers questions from the public while following all Wikipedia rules.

Best regards, François Briod francois@monito.com

--Briodf (talk) 12:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Briodf, thank you for reaching out to me.

Firstly, may I just start by saying that the deletion of the article does not indicate that it is not believed that the company exists, or that it thought not to be reputable!

The reason why the article was deleted was that it was too promotional in tone for a neutral encyclopedia, which is what Wikipedia sets out to be.

In 1. above, you mention a partnership - but the link you provided did not mention Monito;

In 2. above, you give a few links, so let me explain why I do not think that they meet the criteria as suitable sources:

Forbes: Monito is included in a list of "Europe's 10 Most Exciting Technology SMEs For 2018" - but it is a minor mention, without any detailed information about the company itself'
TechCrunch: A quotation from yourself (as founder) - this does not provide any information about the company, and even so, as the information would have been provided by you, it is no an independent source;
Le Monde: Effectively an interview with you, with company-provided information. Again, not an independent source;
RTS: Again, an interview with you, again not independent;
IMTC: Your bio;
"Transparency: the only way forward for remittances": confirms that you spoke at this panel event, but does not provide information about the company
"Global Forum on Remittances" - does not appear to mention your company at all?

As to your assertion that "the vast majority of people looking for information about Monito are looking for our company history, ...", I'm not sure that there is evidence about this one way or another!

In order to have an article created, you would need to provide independent sources (i.e. not using press releases, interviews with company staff, etc) from reliable sources.

Might I suggest that you read the following articles that can provide you with useful information:

Kind regards, PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 14:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
24	Legends II (book) (talk)	Add sources
2,875	Paul Anka (talk)	Add sources
39	The Sandman: A Game of You (talk)	Add sources
1,133	Conan the Barbarian (talk)	Add sources
2,325	The Dark Tower (series) (talk)	Add sources
377	Hercule Poirot in literature (talk)	Add sources
1,599	The Doctor (Doctor Who) (talk)	Cleanup
9	Liu Guosong (talk)	Cleanup
27	Ronnie Aldrich (talk)	Cleanup
1,987	Brian Cox (physicist) (talk)	Expand
116	Sally Spectra (talk)	Expand
2	Christian De Metter (talk)	Expand
18	Bikkle (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
974	Johannes Brahms (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
134	Function word (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
50	The Mill (company) (talk)	Merge
12	Pengci (talk)	Merge
8	Henry Jervey Jr. (talk)	Merge
240	Ultimates (talk)	Wikify
298	Video game music (talk)	Wikify
56	The Masque of Mandragora (talk)	Wikify
4	Jeng Jundian (talk)	Orphan
3	Cheng Haw-Chien (talk)	Orphan
3	Ha Bik Chuen (talk)	Orphan
7	The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger - The Little Sisters of Eluria (talk)	Stub
5	Time and Relative (talk)	Stub
10	Pingtang Bridge (talk)	Stub
9	Piers Bizony (talk)	Stub
46	Robinsons (drink) (talk)	Stub
3	Sherlock Holmes: The Way of All Flesh (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]