User talk:Peace Love10

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

nableezy - 08:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just participating in the discussion on the talk page, not the page itself. Great week :) Peace Love10 (talk) 08:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You arent allowed to participate in any discussion related to the Arab-Israel conflict except for making edit-requests. Please see WP:ARBECR. nableezy - 08:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not written here. Peace Love10 (talk) 09:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The link says Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Should disruption occur on "Talk:" pages, administrators may take enforcement actions described in "B" or "C" below. nableezy - 09:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should I explain you what is "edit requests"? Peace Love10 (talk) 09:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has been reverted per WP:ARBECR, last warning. Selfstudier (talk) 09:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it say that I am not allowed to participate in the conversation discussion? It says to me that it is not allowed to edit only. Peace Love10 (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That has been explained to you already and WP:ARBECR is perfectly clear on the point. Further breaches invite a block. Selfstudier (talk) 10:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The restriction applies to all edits and pages related to the topic area, broadly construed, with the following exceptions:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive."

Yeah, it's very clear. Leave my page now עם ישראל חי (talk) 10:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only make edit request, not engage in discussion. nableezy - 10:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also your requests of other editors to join is WP:CANVASSING and is likewise not allowed. Please try to familiarize yourself with our policies before continuing to attempt to edit one of the more difficult topic areas. nableezy - 10:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming: Posting an excessive number of messages to individual users, or to users with no significant connection to the topic at hand.

in 2005, the Arbitration Committee ruled that "[t]he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Wikipedia's common practice. However, excessive cross-posting goes against current Wikipedia community norms. In a broader context, it is "unwiki." See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/IZAK#Principles.

light use only. עם ישראל חי (talk) 11:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it is based on viewpoint it is not allowed, see WP:INAPPNOTE. nableezy - 11:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for WP:ECR violations, canvassing, and personal attacks, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why. I was told to stop revert the page, and I stop doing it. עם ישראל חי (talk) 17:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can't see your email עם ישראל חי (talk) 18:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Personal attacks

This is an egregious personal attack; future actions like that will result in a block. Please strike the attack, and please also read WP:CANVASS as your comment on that users talk page was a violation of it. BilledMammal (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"You cannot view this diff because one or both of the revisions have been removed from the public archives. Details can be found in the deletion log for this page." עם ישראל חי (talk) 17:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

@ScottishFinnishRadish: First of all, I'm new here, so I think blocking for an infinite time is unfair. I understand that I violated the community rules, but still being blocked for an infinite time does not give me a chance to correct and improve. It is important for me to contribute to Wikipedia. I didn't know about Wikipedia's rules when I joined, I didn't know that it was forbidden to ask users to help me, etc. Now, I started edited without an IP address, at first I was told that it should not be edited because it is about the Israeli-Arab conflict, and that is understandable to me. Just as I do not see that editors with a pro-Palestinian bias will edit without control over their edits, I must not be allowed to edit that way. Wikipedia should reflect balance, neutrality and reliability. So I asked at the Teahouse, and they told me that. I got. So I suggested on the discussion page if it could be promoted. Then you see, that a user who writes in his profile "This user supports the right of all individuals and groups to violently resist military aggression and occupation by other parties" cancels my arguments every time with different excuses. Once, there are not enough sources. So I brought sources. Second time, the sources are not reliable. Third time, the review is unnecessary. Fourth time, I can't participate at all. When you see that these people cancel the criticism - just because it is contrary to their political view - is there objectivity here? I am not objective, that's why I add this to the entry "Criticism of Amnesty" in the "Israel" paragraph, because it is a criticism that, as an Israeli, I have of the organization.

And besides all this criticism, I promise that since I know about the laws, I will not break them, and if I do I understand the consequences. עם ישראל חי (talk) 18:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going be to here, Can I add things for Canada–Iran relations?

@ScottishFinnishRadish: עם ישראל חי (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You

ancsee, that I tried to add things for the page of Talk: Tel Aviv. I do want to contribute and I"ll follow the rules. I am learning. עם ישראל חי (talk) 20:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish: עם ישראל חי (talk) 09:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of what you have said addresses your incredibly over the top personal attack. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I cannot see ever unblocking someone who would write such a thing, but not up to me. It's not the sort of thing you should need "a law" to not do. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I”ll learn I promise, just give me a chance עם ישראל חי (talk) 12:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish: עם ישראל חי (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I hurt people, I won't do it again, I promise. If I will, I will understand that you will block me without warning. I just feel that the behavior of some of the editors here is irrelevant. A user who writes in his profile that it is permissible to violently resist the occupation - that is, I can be killed because I am a Jew living in Israel, comments to me, and every time I try to add it is rejected for one reason or another. It's unpleasant, but sorry again, I'd appreciate a second chance. עם ישראל חי (talk) 13:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish: עם ישראל חי (talk) 16:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't ping people, it's inappropriate. If you wish to be unblocked, make your case as described at WP:GAB. I'll warn you, your claim that other people are (at least partially) responsible for your actions means there's basically no chance your block will be lifted. Still, you are free to make your unblock request if you wish. --Yamla (talk) 16:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t blame anybody but me, I take responsibility about mistakes. Just explain why I did it, I won’t do it again. עם ישראל חי (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And he wrote in his profile “ If you need me, ping me. My watchlist is out of control.”

I need him עם ישראל חי (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't. Make an unblock request; WP:GAB explains how. Or don't, in which case you need to stop posting here. --Yamla (talk) 19:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don’t have to be mean… I’m new in here and I’m learning, I don’t have any bad intentions עם ישראל חי (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You get one more edit. I very strongly suggest it's an unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 19:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To make an unblock request, copy the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock|Insert your reason to be unblocked here עם ישראל חי (talk) 19:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)}}. Don't forget to insert your own reason to replace "Insert your reason to be unblocked here". Its composition will be discussed below. If you find that you cannot edit your talk page, fill out the form at the Unblock Ticket Request System.[reply]

that what i’ve done man… looking for an answer עם ישראל חי (talk) 19:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dang, where's the block talk page access button :) Selfstudier (talk) 16:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don’t understand you עם ישראל חי (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS appeal #91970

is declined. User is deliberately wasting our time with these repeated appeals. Yamla (talk) 10:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #97807

is closed. Courtesy @ScottishFinnishRadish:. User needs to follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks, which entails emailing ScottisFinnishRadish and/or the Arbitration Committee. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:29, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]