User talk:Papataunuku

Red Peak flag

Hello, Sgvrfjs has started a discussion on Talk:Red Peak flag, explain your views there before undoing or reverting any edits. So far your contribution is just blanking the section. Your edit summary says "slanderous material removed". Explain it on the talk page, why they were slanderous or malicious materials while they were sourced. At the moment you look to be edit warring without proper reasons so let discuss on talk page. Thank you and regards. Hitro talk 19:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I put back the section you removed on Red Peak flag. I understand you have issues with it, but I don't know what they are. Let us know on the talk page and we can get a solution. Edit warring isn't constructive, and people can be blocked because of it. Hope to hear from you over at Talk:Red Peak flag. – Hshook (talk) 07:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Papataunuku reported by User:Haminoon (Result: ). Thank you. -- haminoon (talk) 08:19, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm ♠ 08:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]