User talk:PBC

These revisions were based on an examination of the files, and not merely newspaper reports.

Lady Howard of Effingham

No problem. Proteus (Talk) 10:14, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 3

Hello. Since you're pretty new here, you probebly didn't know that editing archives is generally considered a bad idea. Archives exist as a record of discussions, and are not intended to be current talk pages. If there's an issue on an archive you'd like to address, please do so in the talk page of the user or article to whom the issue is related. You can always link or copy/paste the comments on which you'd like to comment. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony 04:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! ==Versageek 08:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

human sacrifice

Hi PBC,

I’ve seen your recent copyedit in the human sacrifice article and requested some sources (newspapers, etc).

If you know some of them please add it to the article (as endnotes references).

Thank you.

—Cesar Tort 18:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The appearance of link spamming

A sensitive issue at Wikipedia right now is something called link-spamming, the possibly indiscriminate inserting of the same or similar external links into numerous articles. Just today you have edited over 40 articles and added a link to http://anti-slaverysociety.addr.com/ to many if not near all of them. It will do your cause no good to be so aggressive as to appear indiscriminate. Indeed, continued abuse could get this link listed so that it will never be allowed, if used to abuse Wikipedia.

I would think it best if you reviewed the number of articles you've added links to, and decide which are truly appropriate for these links:

You can find a listing of all your edits by clicking "User contributions" in the left-hand 'toolbox' links. Shenme 23:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]