User talk:Orfen/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Orfen. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Happy Birthday!
On behalf of the birthday committee happy b-day! By the way, it's ironic that the day that I give you a barnstar, I check later and it's your birthday! Greeves (talk • contribs) 01:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Yup, a happy birthday from me, too :) •The RSJ• Talk | Sign Here 02:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- I wish you a great birthday, Orfen, good presents and great health! WP:BDC +Hexagon1 (t) 05:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry its a bit late, but there is always the whole day to celebrate! Happy Birthday on behalf of WP:BDC. --Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 08:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
happy birthday!
hooray for birthday! —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 03:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Happy Birthday! – Heaven's Wrath Talk 21:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Sig
Please remove the big tags from your sig per WP:SIG. Thanks, Jorcoga (Hi!/Review)07:00, Wednesday, January 31 '07
Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar! WikiProject MMO almost has 50 members now! By the way, maybe you should think about archiving your talk page. Greeves (talk • contribs • reviews) 23:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
major vandalism help
I'm in the process of reverting it, but when you get a chance will you check it after I've finished to make sure I restored everything correctly? Just to keep the checks and balances. Thanks mate!--JUDE talk 20:43, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks so much :) !--JUDE talk 02:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
talk star wars galaxies
I wasn't deleting or editing comments, I merely moved a comment from the incorrect section into the correct section so as to follow RfC format guidelines. Magonaritus 02:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Roguegeek didn't like one of my arguments on the talk page and deleted it. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Star_Wars_Galaxies&diff=115470427&oldid=115470244. Magonaritus 02:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Ah I didn't know that about the standard colour. Sorry! I know the green looked a little toxic but I thught it was highly topical for Green Day remember the American idot video!! Sorry! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "I've been expecting you" 13:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Still a great band though whatever the color!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "I've been expecting you" 11:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Long time no see
You may not remember me but, i was User:Blades2121, and you were the first person to help me out, so I would like you to sign my autograph book! Heres the link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atomic_Religione/Autograph_book --[User:Atomic Religione|ÄtΘmic]]R€£igione;
WikiProject MMO Newsletter - April 2007
WikiProject MMO Quarterly | |||
April 2007 | Issue I |
|
|
|
The Black Parade
Why is the fact that it was certified platinum in there twice? mcr616 Speak! 21:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
OK, thanks for explaining! mcr616 Speak! 21:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I think one of the biggest issues is that's it's not broad in its coverage. There's minimal information about the production of the album, as opposed to an article like Illmatic. The chart performance should probably be expanded; so far, it only appears to cover four countries. There should probably be a section about the singles or even songs from the album. The Black Parade World Tour section is pretty stubby right now as well. ShadowHalo 15:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Teenagers Single
Hey Orfen! I found this: at absolute punk and wondered if it's a reliable source. If so, I think we finally have our source, or at least we know that come the 20th we'll have some sources. Absolute Punk has never lied to me, but there's always a first time for everything.--JUDE talk 19:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
I have added this to the article and sourced. Absolute Punk is a reliable site, and with all the rumors about the Teenagers single I'm pretty sure it will come true. Feel free to remove if you dont agree though. TeamOverload 12:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I have already addressed why the sources you've provided are not reliable- they do not cite their sources. We still have no information that can be traced to MCR or the label in any way, shape, or form. While I would agree that we all know that Teenagers will be the new single, from Wikipedia's perspective this is publishing rumor.
Having already deleted these claims citing this exact source, I'm not removing the info again. I'm going to leave it up to you to sort that out, because I'm getting really fed up with removing the same OR and explaining why it's still OR every time. But the bottom line is this:
A source that cannot be traced all the way back to My Chemical Romance or their representative explicitly stating that Teenagers will be the next single is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. We're still looking at, when it comes down to it, a rumor, and Wikipedia is not a publisher of rumor. I don't know how else to phrase it. --Moralis (talk) 06:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not annoyed with you, just with this whole debacle. The reason I don't consider those sources reliable: there's no evidence that they're not just publishing rumor. The fansites are positively unreliable, because everything they publish is a "we think" kind of a thing. While they know a lot about MCR, rumor's still rumor.
- That "will be released" to radio site is of very ambiguous import. There's absolutely no way to know where they get their information- perhaps they've gotten word from someone who would know that Teenagers will be released next week, or perhaps they're simply reading the same fansites we are, seeing April 23, and posting that as fact. --Moralis (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Hey!
Check out the outreach page! mcr616 Speak! 00:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Et voila! The newsletter is done! Check it out! mcr616 Speak! 00:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
I fixed it. It is the May 07 issue, it was just a small typo. mcr616 Speak! 01:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
OK, should we work on the portal next? mcr616 Speak! 01:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Portal's done. Should we work on the peer review now? mcr616 Speak! 16:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
OK. I'll check out the peer review and the guidelines. mcr616 Speak! 22:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Yea, the newsletter can still be edited. mcr616 Speak! 16:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
OK, since we picked the collaboration, you want me to send out the newsletter? mcr616 Speak! 14:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much for taking the time to comment on my my RfA, which was successful. I learned a lot from the comments, I appreciate everything that was said, and I'll do my best to deserve the community's trust. Thanks again! And thanks for your kind words and support. --Shirahadasha 04:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: Your Sig
Hey thanks man I thought it was some glitch. Thnx Ṣ₡ЯՄ♏ʂɧ♆☭ ♲ recycle kids! omg i'm ur biggest fan...➤ 18:12, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Orfen, thanks for participating in my successful RfA. You wanted to see my answers to the questions; I've written some brief reflections, including an answer to Question 3, in case you're still interested: User:Ragesoss/RfA. --ragesoss 07:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject My Chemical Romance Newsletter
| ||
|
If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject My Chemical Romance. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| |
Complete To Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
|
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
mcr616 Speak! 20:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
MCR Newsletter
Inaccurate: Teenagers is not to be released May 1. No confirmation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TeamOverload (talk • contribs) 12:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC).
RFA thanks
credit for userpage
Wow, i'm flattered this time someone actually copied off me! Thanx for choosing my page. my influence is spreading! lol Ṣ₡ЯՄ♏ʂɧ♆☭ ♲ recycle kids! omg i'm ur biggest fan...➤ 23:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Go ahead, keep it! imitation (or at least copying a userpage layout) is the highest form of flattery. Keep it. but if you ever want to change it in the future, contact me. i may be able to help :) Ṣ₡ЯՄ♏ʂɧ♆☭ ♲ recycle kids! omg i'm ur biggest fan...➤ 00:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 18 | 30 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
My (Selket's) RfA
Thank you, Orfen, for your support on my recent RfA, which recently passed 54/1/1. I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations. I will certainly take the constructive criticism I recieved to heart. Please, if you have any comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page. Thank you again· --Selket Talk 18:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
User:Jhfireboy/Admin Opposer Thanks
Thanks!
Thank you Orfen, for voting on my RfA. Although it failed, I will try to improve in the ways pointed out to me, and maybe I will become an admin next time. If you have any comments, questions, etc., you know where to go. ¿SFGiДnts! ☺ ☻ 21:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC) |
WP:ADOPT input
Hello, Orfen. The Adopt-a-User program is looking for new ideas and input on the program. If you are still interested please stop by the talk page and read some of the ideas being floated and give a comment. If you want to update or change your information on the adopter's list page, now would be a great time! Thanks! V60 干什么? · VDemolitions 03:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 19 | 7 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dark FEAR hallway.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dark FEAR hallway.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bloody FEAR elevator.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bloody FEAR elevator.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Blood pool.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Blood pool.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Blood on ceiling copy.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Blood on ceiling copy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alma on helicopter.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Alma on helicopter.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alice copy.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Alice copy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Orfen. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Alice copy.png) was found at the following location: User:Orfen/Gallery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Orfen. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Alma on helicopter.png) was found at the following location: User:Orfen/Gallery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Orfen, thank you for your kind words in support of my RfA. Please feel free to drop me a note any time if there is anything that I might be able to do for you. Pastordavid 15:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
help a guy out with references?
Hey Orfen. I was recently revamping the Anti-Flag article, one of my favorite bands. I had some references i wanted to put in, so I set it up just like in the Green Day article. But for some reason, the 1st ref brings you down to the Notes section, but it is all code, and the second ref does nothing when you clikc it. Could you help me with fixing this problem so that the refs work functionally? --Ṣ₡ЯՄՊՏɧѱᎦ ☎/ ∑ 23:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- hey thanks! I never knew there was a proper way to format references (a link should just about do it :P) and no idea there was a page. And when a million words are stuffed together in Helvetica font it can be hard to see mistakes. Thanks for the help! --Ṣ₡ЯՄՊՏɧѱᎦ ☎/ ∑ 01:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 20 | 14 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:58, 15 May 2007 (UTC)