User talk:Oreratile1207

Welcome!

Hello, Oreratile1207, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
Simplified Manual of Style
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard is warmly recommended)
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Ask questions at Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
And feel free to make test edits in your own sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Happy editing! Sam Sailor 13:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you ready for editing?

The

Adventure

Hi Oreratile1207!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by Sam Sailor 13:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey and the Roadster Racers

Why do they delete my Edit? Oreratile1207 (talk) 17:55, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oreratile1207, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Oreratile1207! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Young Money Entertainment, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 00:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Having just looked over your recent edits, and removed several of them, I have to urge you to learn more about Wikipedia's style conventions and formatting before adding anything else. It's not reasonable to submit unsourced information which wrecks a table, and expect that edit to stay in place. You are welcome to contribute here, but it's best for everyone if you learn how to do so in a constructive way that improves articles. If I can help with anything, just let me know. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 00:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eternal Atake, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Flooded with them hundreds 08:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eternal Atake

I'm sorry about that, I didn't know, but I'll not do that again, I thought it was unsourced information Oreratile1207 (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey and the Roadster Racers

Everyone please stop removing my edits of Mickey of the roadster racers, for no reason, please respect my edits. Oreratile1207 (talk) 11:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lol Pump

Is your name Lol Pump? Oreratile1207 (talk) 13:24, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About Mickey and the Roadster Racers

Please speak to everyone who removed my edits, pls tell everyone that. Oreratile1207 (talk) 17:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eternal Atake (Lil uzi vert album)

I think why I removed it was because you weren't supposed to edit unsouced tracklists, Flooded with them Hundreds, but im sorry for removing the tracklist for no reason. Thank youzOreratile1207 (talk) 06:46, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey and the Roadster Racers

HJHooker00, do not remove my edits from Mickey and the Roadster Racers because if you want to edit something edit it someone else, stop removing my edits, Orerstile1207 Oreratile1207 (talk) 10:24, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oreratile1207, Where are you getting this information from? HJHooker00 HJHooker00 (talk) 11:33, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well HJHooker00, I see you have removed my edits of Mickey and the Roadster Racers, please stop it, I'll talk to the Disney people

Yandhi track listing

Guys, do not remove the Yandhi tracklists for no valid reason, whenever there tracklists are made, please leave them alone, because you said I mustnt remove the tracklists of Eternal Atake, guys I want you to be aware, if you remove my edits on Mickey and the Roadster Racers, I'll remove every edit you guys edit, stop it now. Oreratile1207 (talk) 14:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Oreratile! This is your user talk page where messages are posted to you. If you want to tell someone something, you should go to their talk page and post a message, to which they will respond with an indentation. You can also message them directly with a ping using {{ping|USERNAME}}. Flooded with them hundreds 14:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm Vistadan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Yandhi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vistadan 16:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Yandhi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vistadan 16:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Yandhi. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Vistadan 14:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vistadan

🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊I won't violate Wikipedia this time I'm sorry please. Oreratile1207 (talk) 15:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Donald Glover are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Yhandi. You've been doing this for over a week now. You will be temporarily blocked the next time you add an unsourced tracklist or similar. Anarchyte (talk | work) 08:58, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Global Citizen Festival was unsourced as well. Do you need help with finding and formatting sources? (please ping on reply) Sam Sailor 07:29, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yandhi

Sorry again, but I didn't add the names but I won't add it again. Oreratile1207 (talk) 11:59, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet and Short

Since Sweet and Short was released just yesterday, it hasn't received the significant coverage in independent reliable sources yet that Wikipedia requires for a standalone article. See WP:TOOSOON and WP:NALBUM. When that time comes you can recover your last version of the article here. —teb728 t c 11:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 08:39, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 08:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal information

Hi. If you are a young person, it is unwise to post personal identifying information on your user page (or anywhere else on Wikipedia). But don't worry, it has been removed now and can not be seen. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Check your tone

The way that you are addressing other editors is NOT appreciate. Your threats to revert any changes other people make is in violation of multiple policies. You have been warned multiple times and multiple editors have offered to assist you but you continue to attack. I would advise you to check your tone and stop lashing out at people. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You must provide references for the content you add. You cannot threaten to revert other editor's good work in retaliation for reverting your poor work. That is completely unacceptable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:10, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, I recommend you do the Wikipedia Adventure before editing. It's a good tool for teens wanting to edit, especially you. You should learn the policies and etiquette before jumping in. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 05:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen328

Cullen328, please unblock me I'll stop retaliating to revert other editor's pages, please I'm begging you. Oreratile1207 (talk) 08:27, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to DJ Khaled discography

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edits may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Khaled discography

Which ones?, Oreratile1207 (talk) 08:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juanita Bynum

The article Juanita Bynum has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —teb728 t c 08:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Nigerian gospel musicians appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Skepta discography, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced information, especially in biographies

Hello Oreratile1207, please stop adding unsourced biographical information as you did at Mendi Msimang and Juanita Bynum - as already mentioned by several other editors above. Ideally all content on Wikipedia should be sourced. But controversial information, exceptional claims, and biographical information must be sourced. Content cannot be based just on an editor's personal knowledge or own research, but always needs to be verifiable with a published reliable source.

The basic guidelines are WP:RS (how to identify a reliable source), WP:REFB (how to add required inline-citations) and WP:BLP (the even stricter requirements for biographies of living people). I strongly recommend to read through these guidelines to avoid problems, before you make any further content-related edits. If you have any questions or need advice, please feel free to post at WP:Teahouse. Volunteers there will be glad to help. GermanJoe (talk) 21:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jesse Jagz. Rob van vee 09:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sources

Why did you remove sources from Van Breda murders here:[1]? Bakazaka (talk) 20:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Van Breda murders

Because Robvanvee removed my edits of Sho Madjozi, Olamide and Phyno, sorry Oreratile1207 (talk) 21:38, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you not add sources to those articles supporting your edits? Bakazaka (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oreratile1207, are you continuing to remove reliable sources added by other editors to retaliate against them? I have previously warned you about this behavior. Please explain or I will have no choice except to block you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They have "retaliated" on several of my edits, seemingly as retribution for my reverting their edits that were unsourced. I went out of my way on my talk page to explain why and how referencing is done but to no avail. Rob van vee 06:31, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Your retaliatory behavior is not acceptable. It must stop. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 16:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

When you get back and if you intend to edit constructively, note that I have sourced your edit for you here. This is to show you how easy it is but do not expect others to do that for you. Take a look at what I've done and copy the same method when you add info in the future please. If you need help, ask any experienced editor. Rob van vee 19:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Referencing for beginners for additional information. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sho Madjozi. Jim, it seems the block and pleading didn't work. Rob van vee 20:02, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Limpopo Champions League

What?, why do u want to block me, and I'm not adding unsourced material at Limpopo Champions League, and As I told you Uncle robvanvee, Limpopo Champions League is the debut studio album by Sho Madjozi and stop removing my edits, I wanted to add reliable sources, stop saying it is unsourced, it's not unsourced. Oreratile1207 (talk) 20:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is your source for the other information you added to articles? Bakazaka (talk) 20:40, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oil, iyilu ife

Phyno released 2 singles this December uncle Bakazaka, and also Sho Madjozi released her debut album Limpopo Champions league Oreratile1207 (talk) 20:49, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In Wikipedia world, "source" is an article or book about the subject that discusses the information you're trying to add. For example, is there an article in The Star or Mail and Guardian or News24 or The Mercury or a similar reliable news source that says what Phyno released? Bakazaka (talk) 20:54, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly this person has no intention of learning how to source. I've sourced one of their edits and pointed them to it via a link to show them how. Ive put links on their talk page several times that would take them to referencing for beginners but to this point I doubt they even looked at it. I, as well as several other editors including an admin have requested repeatedly that they please source their edits and in the process have left countless messages and warnings on their talk page. They have already been blocked twice for this exact reason and yet as soon as block passes they continue unabated. If this editor really wanted to edit constructively, they would have made attempts to do so by asking for help from those who have repeatedly offered it, such as yourself, Bakazaka. Personally I think as the interested admin, Jim needs to put his foot down so Ill ping him here. I've really tried to be patient but unfortunately I've reached the end of my tether in this regard. Rob van vee 04:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Robvanvee: Agreed. Many thanks for your efforts. Bakazaka (talk) 04:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked for one week from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You must provide references whenever you add new content. This is not negotiable. Please spend the next week studying Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:29, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You have been blocked for two weeks from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are also failing to provide references as required. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:11, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Babes Wodumo was completely unacceptable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Oreratile1207: I appreciate your consistent passion for editing but after seeing this block, I'm worried you risk the possibility of being banned for even longer or permanently. Please, reach out to other editors to help cite your information and don't be afraid to use talk pages! You should write an appeal admitting fault even if the appeal isn't accepted; it's best to show you know what you've done is against the rules of editing. I'm expecting the best once you get unbanned! Nice4What (talk) 00:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just more of the same unsourced edits, so my advice Nice4What, don't hold your breath. Rob van vee 15:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Phyno. User:Cullen328 Here we go again. The short blocks don't seem to be working and "I don't know how to add reliable sources" is NOT an acceptable excuse! Rob van vee 15:55, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please study Referencing for beginners while you are blocked. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Now, I have revoked your talk page access because you were using it for harassing administrator who blocked you. This is not appropriate for two reasons: (i) harassment is not going to be tolerated here; (ii) this is not an appropriate usage of the talk page. I will now remove your comments and revision-delete them (make them invisible). I also was considering blocking you for indefinite duration. I decided giving you the last chance, but you should clearly understand that your next block, be it for copyright violations, for personal attack, or for whatever other reason, will be for indefinite duration, and thus most likely the last one. You have been given enough rope to use it well. Please use the time remaining to the expiration of your current block to study our policies, because when you start editing again it will be expected that you are familiar with the policies. Have a nice time.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To follow up on what Ymblanter has said, I recommend you take the The_Wikipedia_Adventure, that you learn how to cite content, that you not add anymore material copied from elsewhere, and that you learn to discuss changes if reverted. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

It's extremely important that you stop posting your personal information on Wikipedia. While it's fine to include your general interests and hobbies, posting things such as where you were born and your birth date creates a privacy issue, so please do not include it on your user page.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:34, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You also edited using a sockpuppet account while blocked the last time. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:03, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removing me

What did I do now?, I did nothing Oreratile1207 (talk) 18:04, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oreratile1207/Archive says otherwise. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:22, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

User has engaged in block evasion as of May, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 12:00, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Black Rat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Black Rat, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It is a draft which has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CptViraj (Talk) 08:28, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sweet and Short

Hello, Oreratile1207. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sweet and Short".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hip Hop Pantsula (album)

Hello, Oreratile1207. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hip Hop Pantsula".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 03:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]