User talk:Onel5969/NPPSchool/A.WagnerC

Reply

@Onel5969:Thanks. Yes, I have interest. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC, excellent. Then please answer the first question. Welcome aboard! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

@Onel5969: I replied. Please, see if it's good, when you can. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 02:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC

Section 1

@Onel5969: Hello. I replied the section 1. Can you see later? I thank you. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 02:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC, hi. Finished it. I'll always try to grade your answers the same day I get them. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Section 2

@Onel5969: Hello. I replied the section 2. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 03:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC, hi. No need to let me know you've responded, I have the page on my watchlist, so it lets me know when there are any changes. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Sorry. Okay then. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 03:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC,

- no need to be sorry. Don't hesitate to ask questions either on this talk page, or within the school page. Here's a question, since you do most of your editing on PT wiki, is English not your first language? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: No, english it's my second language. Have I made a lot of grammar mistakes? 😵 I confess that I still have some weaknesses. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 04:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC, no, actually, you have not made any grammar mistakes. It's more a question of syntax. I've done very limited work on other language WP's, and am a typical American, in that I am not fluent in a second language. I was simply curious. And excited. It is always wonderful when we get an editor who's primary language is not English to do competent editing on English WP. Proud to know. you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 Thanks. English is a language that is present in many things. In most games (I am very fond of articles about games, principally old games), in computing, so I thought it necessary to learn that language. I decided to write in the enwiki to improve my knowledge and also because this is where the most articles are found. But I am not limited to just writing things related to Lusophone culture. I'm actually open to writing about a lot of things, mostly articles about games and movies. However, for reach the 24 articles for autoreviewer, I think I will translate some articles from ptwiki because it's difficult to find unpublished themes in the enwiki. Interestingly, there are 2 articles that I created for enwiki but did not translate to pt wiki yet. If you have any article suggestions to be created on enwiki, I accept. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 15:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC, I think our interests run in different directions regarding article creation. I mostly create articles about films (mostly pre-1960), film bios, and history. I think that if you just find articles on Pt, which have no corresponding article on En, simply translating them, and providing appropriate refs would be incredibly helpful. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will look for some that are worth translating. I read the comments. Can we go to the next step? ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Section 2

A.WagnerC, hi. I haven't scared you away, have I?

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Ohh excuse me. The week is tight. I intend to answer the questionnaire on Friday. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC, no worries. We're not in a rush, just wanted to make sure you had seen I had put out the next set. Take your time. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I replied all. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 00:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Content Policy

Onel5969Sorry, I'm more focused on Wikipedia during the weekends. The Hannibal question made me think a little more hehe. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 18:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi A.WagnerC - just wanted to find out if you were still interested in continuing. You are doing quite well, and Lord knows we could use quality NPP reviewers. No pressure, just that you haven't responded to the last set in over a week. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:29, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Onel5969. Yes, really. Sorry. I should have replied on Saturday past. I will answer the questions on Friday at night. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 05:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries A.WagnerC, just wanted to touch base. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking in to work to promote League of Legends: Wild Rift to GA. If I succeed, I'll try the same in ptwiki but I plan to promote it in enwiki before. What do you think? Are there good chances? ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 06:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I'm not really that involved with GA articles and reviews. I was at one time, but that was years ago. Looking at the article, it appears to meet most of the 6 criteria. I would point out that the gameplay section is wholly uncited, so that would probably be an issue. From reading the article, a deficiency I see is in the history/development area, in that it doesn't go in-depth enough into how it is the follow-up to the earlier game, and what the differences/improvements are. But again, GA reviews are not really my forte. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your observation is of great value. I will first work on the reception topic, then I will analyze the other sections. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 19:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: I have a positivist view in relation to norms, so I usually try to justify that Wikipedia is that way because there is a policy or consensus that establishes that it should be that way

Filtering - Criteria for speedy deletion

@Onel5969: Should I consult new pages local and to mark articles for speedy deletion? ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 18:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC, yes. Absolutely. And for this exercise, I would suggest starting from the newest articles, as there tend to be more candidates there for CSD. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Can you see my first answer? I want to know if I am on the right track? I wrote Gaza–Israel clashes and Elhuyar, but the creator of the first article changed it to redirect page. Only Elhuyar is as article. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 01:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC, hi. Two things, first, I am unclear what the 3 links you provide as an example are for. Only one did you nominate for A7. Now, second, the one you did nominate, there is nothing wrong with your nomination, although it will depend on which admin reviews the request. And this leads into the A7 rationale. A7 is a lighter standard than notability. It is only that there is a claim of significance. For instance, the first lady of a state in the US, she might not be notable, but the claim of being the first lady of say, Rhode Island, is a claim of significance, so a speedy delete would not apply. Your example is a social media warrior. These are tough. Some admins will say that the #'s they have on Tik Tok and YouTube will be a claim of significance, albeit whether they make the person notable is a different standard. There are a lot of speedy's which are easy, this is not one of them. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC - hi there. Not sure if you saw my response above. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

onel5969 Very sorry. It's open a civil service entrance examination to Public defender function in my state [1]. I intend to spend a lot of my time studying to get that job. Because of this, I intend to take a break from Wikipedia, at least for activities that require time, for a few months. For quick activities like reversing or correcting, I'll still keep doing. But I will back. Is it okay to pause the school during that six-month period? ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 00:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC, absolutely. Simply ping me when you want to restart. Good luck!! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC - Welcomme back. How did the examinations go? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:29, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Actually, the examination will be in August. But in my free time I will try to complete the speedy deletion phase. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 13:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Hello. Can't we go to the next step? It is very difficult to find an article that is in a condition to speedy deletion for a specific breach of some rules. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC, absolutely. Will load the next section shortly. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 14:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.WagnerC, hi again. Sorry for the delay, the real world got in the way. When I went to add the next session, I see what I think is a slight misinterpretation of the existing exercise. The exercise isn't asking you to actually nominate stuff for speedy deletion. We simply want you to regurgitate how you interpret each of the guidelines (first column), and then provide an example which would meet your criteria as expressed in column A (second column). So in other words, for G1 as an example you might put something like: Imagonnadoit. Hopefully that makes sense now, and I'm sorry you were struggling with this, I should've reached out to you sooner. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969, Hi. Apologies for the delay. I was out of perfect time for this, but I think I'm done. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 18:34, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]