User talk:Onel5969/Archive 35

Archive 30

←

Archive 33

Archive 34

Archive 35

Archive 36

Archive 37

→

Archive 40

Archive 35: October 2016

Dr.M.Thangavelu, Former Principal, Trivandrum Medical College

Dear Editor,

Here is a bio that has been languishing for years, and now time to enrich TVM website list of principals :http://www.tmc.kerala.gov.in/index.php/succession-list-of-principal

Dr. M. Thangavelu MD. [Munnar, 21 July 1921 - Chennai, 09 October 2009]

Dr.M.Thangavelu, a pathologist by training, was an architect of medical education and health care reform and delivery in South India and South East Asia. He was on the faculty of the Trivandrum Medical College during the institution’s formative stages and served as Chairman of the Pathology Department(1953-1968) and was appointed as the fifth principal and dean of medical education during a period of rapid growth for the institution(1957-1969).

The systems and infrastructures he established and helped mature over five decades, first at the regional level in Kerala, followed by his contribution to the management of non-communicable diseases across nations of the South East Asian Region(SEARO) as adviser to the World Health Organization-SEARO are considered models for sustainable health care. Upon retiring from duties and still consultant to WHO, he was invited to become the founding dean of the PSG Institute of Medical Sciences(1985-1989) in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

File:639387033309

Dr.M.Thangavelu

All good wishes, Madhu

Mthangavelu (talk) 20:28, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Madhu :https://pressroom.usc.edu/madhu-thangavelu/

16:48:14, 11 October 2016 review of submission by Gaffen

• Gaffen (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Lee Simmons (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey, I am requesting a review after a comprehensive review of the language used in the article and ensuring that as many citations as possible have been used both to inform notability and to verify from a range of neutral sources. Please let me know if you require further action and I will gladly look into this. I am also looking into getting some better quality sources (I am aware that the twitter source is especially weak!), and into getting some CC licensed images of work to upload to wikimedia. Gaffen (talk) 16:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Do you know anything about these?

Hello O. I hope that you are well. I know you aren't editing as much as you used but a question has come up that you might be able to help with. It is in regards to August Wilson's 10 play cycle. This is the section that is currently in WikiP's article August Wilson#The Pittsburgh Cycle. This is the statement on my talk page User talk:MarnetteD#Pittsburgh Cycle August Wilson that sent me to find sourcing for the various names that have been used to label the cycle. This is the post that I have made on the talk page for AW's article Talk:August Wilson#The 10 play cycle. If you have any knowledge about the history of these names I would appreciate anything that you can add/remove/change to the article. If not no worries. I hope that you are having a pleasant autumn! Best regards. MarnetteD|Talk 19:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

• Hi MarnetteD - will respond on the thread on your talk page. That way all the discussion will be together. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you O. I think it would be useful to add your post (and my reply to it) to the thread on Wilson's talk page that I started. I did not want to do that without asking you first. I hope you got to see the American Masters episode about him. If not it looks like it might be available on the web somewhere. I really appreciate the time you took in looking into this. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 00:10, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

I have no issue with that. And you don't have to ask my permission, you're one of the good guys. . I'm only semi-retired. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:15, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I am glad you still pop round from time to time and I am always happy when I see your name on my watchlist. Enjoy the week ahead :-) MarnetteD|Talk 23:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

The Exorcist (franchise)

Hi, thanks for your review of "The Exorcist (franchise)" page, I was wondering would you have any advice on how to made it seem less like a personal opinion piece? As it stands none of the text in it is original, it's all from the various pages it links to. I was going for something like this: National Treasure (franchise) Damiantgordon (talk) 12:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Damiantgordon - I think it's an excellent start. You simply need to provide references for any qualitative statements. e.g. when you talk about criticism, or the film being re-edited, provide a source. The article itself is well written, just needs sourcing. Good luck! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. you're a gent! Damiantgordon (talk) 12:23, 29 October 2016 (UTC)