User talk:Omo95

Omo95, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Omo95! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Omo95, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:16, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Omo95. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 11:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Omo95! You created a thread called Restricted topics at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is a sockpuppet and why have I been blocked?

@78.26:

I am not really sure what this mean. I have been blocked from editing and it says cause I am sockpuppet of someone. Can you please explain what this mean? and how can I get myself unblocked?

ThanksOmo95 (talk) 09:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sock puppetry 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:40, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Omo95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry if there is a confusion, I have no idea who user:zacknoor123 is, I have never met him. I guess there has been a huge confusion. I am not a rookie and neither am I someone who is doing this for fun. As user:zacknoor123 stated this is a co-working space, where there are 700 employees working in more than 25 companies. It is impossible to know everyone of them who works here. I still don't understand the reason to block me cause after reading the entire document Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. I understand there is a block to be presented only if any of the users use wikipedia for vandalism. But I have gone through user:zacknoor123's edits and I don't see any vandalism. I am sure I haven't vandalized any of the pages. So, Please let me know what was so vandalizing about the edits that I have made. Omo95 (talk) 15:56, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You and Zacknoor123 are obvious related. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Omo95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We haven't met and neither do we know each other. But if it helps the case, user:zacknoor123, let's catch up in the smoke zone on monday around 1 in the noon. I will be wearing a brown shirt. I suppose a picture could clear doubts, If it doesn't then, thank you so much for giving me a chance to add some information. Could have been helpful on making some relevant changes. I request people to rethink about the block again

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. In this account's case, there's also the issue of likely undeclared paid editing, even if the evidence of sockpuppetry weren't quite convincing. Huon (talk) 17:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.