Jump to content

User talk:OckhamTheFox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, OckhamTheFox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - Darwinek 19:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for something to do? WikiProject Furry is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to have you on board.

Our current goal is to raise Anthrocon, furry convention and furry fandom to good article status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are plenty of other articles to work on. Give it a go and let us know how you're doing!

You received this one-time invitation because you are a Furry Wikipedian. GreenReaper 23:12, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Seventh Brother, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikibin.org/articles/the-seventh-brother.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Seventh Brother, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Seventh Brother (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Regarding Your Editing for a 200+ Time Banned Sockpuppet

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not cease acting as a proxy for Bambifan101, you will be reblocked. You will not be receiving further warnings from me. Enigmamsg 06:12, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We both know that's not true. If you want to dance around the truth, that's fine, but this is your last chance. Next time you reinstate edits of a banned sockpuppeteer here at en.wiki, you will be blocked. Enigmamsg 07:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What do I need to prove? You already admitted what you were doing. Enigmamsg 07:33, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's accurate. Enigmamsg 07:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You can still edit them if you for some reason want to. You just must not edit for Bambifan. Enigmamsg 12:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Fox and the Hound characters

[edit]

I think that a List of The Fox and the Hound characters is a splendid idea, though I would advise you to write it yourself based on watching the movie. If User:Collectonian blows her top, just point out the way she keeps defending and blocking contributions to the List of InuYasha characters.--Marktreut (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OckhamTheFox, I advise you to ignore him, as he is another sockpuppeter and will likely be blocked soon. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's puzzling how there's so many users editing the same way User:Bambifan101 used to edit. It seems like that he's gathered a lot of meat puppets for some reason. -- Myfavouritecolourispink 21:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, he socks like crazy from a variety of locations. He is also getting a lot of meat puppets by hitting the other language Wikipedias, and either playing the victim to convince an experienced editor there to do edits for him or, as in this case, being honest about why he can't edit and then (hopefully) just duping them into believing he wants to turn over another leaf. I still hate to think anyone is actually editing for him knowing fully well that they are acting inappropriately.-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
User:Collectonian's allegation of sockpuppeting does not appear to have gotten anywhere. She presented what she thought was good verifiable evidence which was ignored and was reprimanded herself for "multiple instances of Twinkle misuse". How does it feel? Anyway, that being the case, I see no reason why the List of The Fox and the Hound characters idea cannot proceed.--Marktreut (talk) 15:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The case is still open. And there is plenty of reason it cannot proceed as multiple people have already told him on the article talk page not to do it. Acting against consensus is not appropriate, not that you care about that. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:30, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback abuse

[edit]

Not that I can find. Maybe your best bet would be to go to Wikipedia:Contact us and report the abuse or request arbitration. Cheers.--Marktreut (talk) 17:34, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, ArbCom is not for such things, nor have I ever used rollback against you. And considering your actions, I'd suggest you not call anymore attention to yourself before your block is reinstated. You violated Wikipedia policy deliberately and without apology in editing for a known vandal and sockpuppetter and you KNEW what you were doing. I'm honestly surprised no one is working to have your administrative rights removed at the Russian Wikipedia, but it seems they have fewer rules there. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Here's something that has been left on my talk page: "If someone abuses the Rollback feature, their rollback priveliege will be revoked", courtesy of 科学高爾夫迷. Cheers.--Marktreut (talk) 15:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended

[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Per Wikipedia:Banning policy#Editing on behalf of banned users and Bambifan101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) your continued efforts and advocacy in editing articles that have been the targets of Bambifan101, your acknowledged discussions with Bambifan101, and your off wiki interactions with Bambifan101 - as evidenced by requests to email - indicate a knowing violation of the above policy and section. I am uninterested in ru-WP and how they might do things, but on en-WP acting on behalf of a banned user is not tolerated. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:21, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So I'm undeleted the The Seventh Brother (Bambifan) discussion page with my answers to him. It was previously deleted by me according ru:ВП:НУВ (translation) a Ru-Wikipedia policy dealing with vandal's motivation of Herostratic fame. You also may read The Seventh Brother's messages to me here and here.
{{Hello}} При вопросах можете обратиться к участнику [[Обсуждение участника:Omatosan|Omatosan]] — 20:31, 2 мая 2009 (UTC)

== [[Мэнникс, Дэниэл Пратт|Дэниэл Мэнникс]] ==
Здравствуйте. Простите, откуда такие данные, что мультфильмы [[Похождения императора]] и [[Не бей копытом]] являеются экранизациями романов Дэниэля Мэнникса? [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 13:11, 12 июля 2009 (UTC)

I prefer to write articles about movies I watched before. Better you translte the Seventh Brother yourself. I will correct it after you. [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 18:17, 12 июля 2009 (UTC)

Nope. I haven't read Mannix's novel. I have watched only Disney's [[The Fox and the Hound]]. [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 21:23, 12 июля 2009 (UTC)

The Seventh Brother, sorry I don’t have any info regarding Mannix’s book. I’m fan of Fox and the Hound movie as well as Dargay Attila’s «[[Вук (мультфильм)|Вук]]». Ok, I will watch The Seventh Brother by your recommendation. I started downoloading of TSB. [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 01:05, 15 июля 2009 (UTC)

Yep. [[The Fox and the Hound]] characters are cute. Their appearances are the cutest (sry my English vocabulary is so small). I like the fox ones — Tod and his vixen. Yep, a hound saves a fox from a hunter, because they were friends. Sweet yeah, not like peta’svideos about foxhunts. Your info regarding rip-offs is very interesting. Looks like you’re an expert here. I don’t like cgi movies and cgi era of animation as a whole. Poor character designs and simple plots (though I like Alex the Lion design, especially his funny exaggerated hand-paws with black pads) The past movies were more dramatic which maked you to emapathetic to characters. The new movies done only for fun. P.S. You should give a try for European movies like «[[El lince perdido]]» or «[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1068997/ El Arca]». [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 13:10, 15 июля 2009 (UTC)

You may write an English article The Seventh Brother here [[Участник:The Seventh Brother]]. I will copy it to English Wikipedia. I think English Wikipedia must have an article about this movie. [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 20:09, 18 июля 2009 (UTC) 

{{уд-уд|Новый братишка}} --[[User:Zurik|Zurik]] 06:12, 13 июля 2009 (UTC)

{{вандализм}} [http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Википедия:К_удалению/17_июля_2009&diff=prev&oldid=17180749]--[[User:Mstislavl|Victoria]] 14:38, 19 июля 2009 (UTC)

== [[Не бей копытом]] ==
Done. [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 18:33, 19 июля 2009 (UTC)

== [[:en:The Seventh Brother]] ==

Done. [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 20:26, 19 июля 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. Look like it is not as easy as it seemed to me. Drat! [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 21:10, 19 июля 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't do anything beyond copying article. I already done my best. I can write articles only in Russian language. [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 02:25, 20 июля 2009 (UTC)

== English Wikipedia ==
I can help you by submitting original content to English Wikipedia, but I can’t help you with modifying entirre articles. It is a different action that requires more attention and understanding of English Wikipedia conditions. I noticed this [[:en:User:Collectonian|Collectonian user]] can be a big problem since she targets Disney-themed articles. I like the movie [[The Fox and the Hound]] but I can’t say that I like English Wikipedia so much to sacrifice my account there. I can only say that reverting and calling good-faith edits «vandalism» like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Fox_and_the_Hound_2&diff=235887701&oldid=235882960 this] will result in a ban in Russian Wikipedia by its rules. This is a pity that such users exist. [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 04:30, 20 июля 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't help. English Wikipedia is retarded. Please don't modify my messages. [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 18:02, 20 июля 2009 (UTC)
== Hans Zimmer ==
Yep, I like his score too. I like "This Land" and "Under the Stars". Did you notice that [[Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron]] soundtrack have similaritites to [[The Lion King]]'s ost?. [[Участник:OckhamTheFox|OckhamTheFox]] 01:53, 21 июля 2009 (UTC)

== Вандализм ==

Этот участник [http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=The_Seventh_Brother заблокирован в нескольких разделах] и есть подозрение, что в ру-вики он готовит материал для дезинформацию про Диснея в ен-вики через других участников. Прошу обратить внимание. А также удалить [[Участник:The Seventh Brother/The Seventh Brother]], [[Fox and the Hound 2 C classic upgrade]], [[The Fox and the Hound GA draft]]. [[User:Infovarius|infovarius]] 10:18, 21 июля 2009 (UTC)
: Дополнительная информация о блокировках: [[:en:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:OckhamTheFox and Bambifan101]], [[meta:Steward requests/Global#Bambifan101 Sockpuppets]]. [[User:Infovarius|infovarius]] 10:42, 21 июля 2009 (UTC)

== BambiFan ==

Вы можете запустить, но вы не можете спрятать. --[[User:Vicenarian|Vicenarian]] 21:55, 21 июля 2009 (UTC)


You may notice clearly where my collaboration with The Seventh Bear ended. This was a day before the day when dear Collectonian warned me that The Seventh Bear is long time vandal Bambifan (oh you call them sockpuppets) and that reinstating of such edits is forbidden by En-Wikipedia policies.
Contacting abusers via Email or IRC as well as mediation is common practice in Russian Wikipedia. Sometimes speaking with abusers politely can solve vandalism issues. You may also know Bambifan is not a exclusively the English Wikipedia issue anymore. So my involvement is quite predictable. As for now I don't see any sense of blocking Wikipedia admin because he is doing his job. OckhamTheFox (talk) 20:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Per LessHeard vanU, I concur - no reason not to give another chance. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 21:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 21:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

[edit]

I am countermanding your edit to Seagate Technology. For one thing, you turned a grammatically correct lead sentence into laughably wrong Engrish. I hope you are not actually an Engrish speaker; if you are, please leave English Wikipedia editing to English native language editors. Please pay more attention to what you are doing when editing Wikipedia. Second, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball or a publisher of original research (which includes speculation). See WP:NOT and WP:NOR. When Western Digital actually passes Seagate and that fact is duly reported, then you can modify the lead accordingly. --Coolcaesar (talk) 04:10, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I just tried to remove vanity. OckhamTheFox (talk) 22:21, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]