User talk:OLLSZCZ

Birmingham Pheonix, colour and syntax

Hello. I've gone back to the simpler tables which I edited down on this page. The reasons for this are:

the table is much simpler - I was really confused when I read the original version about where the team had finished - and I follow cricket in the UK closely. Was it 3rd or 1st or something else?
- to my mind, it makes no sense at all to have two separate tables for the seasons and I can't think of another example where we do that
the table syntax is much simpler - the additional rowspans are complex and the use of span tags and then bolding using wiki markup is incredibly complex - and I've been known to write HTML tables by hand for over 25 years
- the empty black column between each part of the table is particularly difficult to understand
- I considered splitting the tables into men's and women's and might end up doing that. From an accessibility point of view this would probably be a better approach to take
the colours add nothing to the article other than to prettify it. I don't believe that's necessary and I do believe that it makes it harder to read the tables, particularly on a small screen or if you have issues with reading colours or with visual impairment
- I don't understand why you had 3rd and 1st both coloured what looks like gold - and seems, at first glance, to be the same colour
- for me this is a significant accessibility issue - both the orange text on black and the white text on orange lack sufficient contrast in my view
- for me, accessibility trumps any cosmetic benefit - although I don't see the cosmetic benefit either

I'll note as well that there are no sources and we lack prose to place the tables in context. They could be removed for both reasons. This would be a much better use of time. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:23, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your explanation regarding the table.

regarding the confusion, I can understand from a different perspective now how it would be confusing, however the current layout you have suggested provides no information if the team has reached the knockout stages. You can be 1st during the group stage, yet win in the play-off knockout stage. Birmingham Phoenix finished 1st (men) and 3rd (women) in the group stage. Both teams then lost in their eliminator games, the women finishing 3rd at the conclusion of the tournament, the men finishing 2nd.
- regarding the two tables, there are examples of where this additional information is beneficial, after all, the group stage result and the final tournament result are different things. For instance; Tom Brady#NFL career statistics, however as a compromise and as the hundreds format is more akin to American competitions, I will next set it out like is shown on List of LA Galaxy seasons. I will then add notes for the eliminator games so that it lists the games played, won, lost, etc. so the information is still there but not directly on a table.
regarding the splitting of the tables, as this will lead to less confusion overall I will try to use this.
regarding colours adding nothing, again, I can see your point, but what is confusing is to why you haven't removed colours from other areas of the article. I would say the contrast of orange and black/white is easier to see than the gold and red shown by the teams player list, and these are not even the colours of Birmingham Phoenix. I can see your argument for removing colour as an accessibility concern/adding nothing but cosmetic looks. But then it is surely all removed for the same reason?
- regarding the colours of bronze and gold, I will make sure these are clearer, but I will be leaving them on as it is normal for these to occur on sports pages regarding finishing position.
regarding references, references added.

Thank you. OLLSZCZ (talk) 09:34, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that looks a lot better. I've done a little tweaking and copyediting - and it could use a prose introduction. In particular I've removed the colours for the group stage - it makes it look as if the team won something in that stage to me. Hope that's OK.

I've also removed the colours from the squad table - thanks for reminding me; I literally ran out of time as I'm not regularly anywhere near a computer for a while now. I've tried to tweak a couple of things in that section as well to remove quite so much stuff in the TOC. I'm not entirely sure that it works for the captains section - can you think of a different way to do this? Personally I'm not sure we need this information here and am particularly unhappy with the stand in captains being shown - it's something that tends to lead to very long lists in time. Perhaps these would be better on the season articles? (which I need to get to at some point to deal with the flags.

The one other thing you might be able to help me with straight away is the colour boxes on the main article. These need checking first and then text added to go with the colour boxes.

Then, if you're happy with the changes I've made, I suggest we use this as a template for the other team articles? Blue Square Thing (talk) 06:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your edit removing the colours from the squad table - please feel free to share your general thoughts at the talk page. It would be really helpful to get your perspective.

I've just gone through 2021 Birmingham Phoenix season to try to see what it would look like with this sorts of edits that I'm thinking about. I've moved some things around as well - this is all a bit experimental. I've also used a collapsible version of the matches which takes up a little less real estate. I'd be interested in your thoughts when you get the chance - I've made notes in the edit summaries to explain most things as well I think. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think the changes you have made on the season page massively improves the look and ease of the article. I have no complaints about any of the changes, but may suggest that the collapsible version of the matches is also used for the eliminator games. Other than that, its a really positive change overall. OLLSZCZ (talk) 09:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I;m not sure about the eliminator - on whole season pages we'd tend to keep those expanded (so, on 2022 season of the hundred. I'm not certain whether it would work or not on a team season page - by all means try it and see what it looks like - the syntax is dead easy. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so I think I've worked through all the Birmingham pages and done the sort of things we agreed on. Can you have a quick check and let me know if there's anything that doesn't make sense at some point please? I'll probably sort the squad tables out first for the other pages - there are some find and replace routines that I can use to shortcut those. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 London Spirit season moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2023 London Spirit season. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Significa liberdade (talk) 01:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Birmingham Phoenix season moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2023 Birmingham Phoenix season. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Significa liberdade (talk) 01:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, OLLSZCZ. Thank you for your work on Adam Kardaś. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jarosław Ambroziak

Hello, OLLSZCZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jarosław Ambroziak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Leszek Antos

Hello, OLLSZCZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leszek Antos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jarosław Ambroziak

Hello, OLLSZCZ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jarosław Ambroziak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Polish Women's Rugby 7's Championships

Hello, OLLSZCZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Polish Women's Rugby 7's Championships, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Polish Women's Rugby 7's Championships

Hello, OLLSZCZ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Polish Women's Rugby 7's Championships".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krystian Gergella for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krystian Gergella, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krystian Gergella until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2023 London Spirit season

Hello, OLLSZCZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 London Spirit season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2023 London Spirit season

Hello, OLLSZCZ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 London Spirit season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bartosz Brzęk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bartosz Brzęk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bartosz Brzęk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2023 Birmingham Phoenix season

Hello, OLLSZCZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 Birmingham Phoenix season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Lechia Gdańsk records and statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Liga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bartosz Brzęk moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bartosz Brzęk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of a discussion at the following AfD [[1]].. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Let'srun (talk) 13:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2023 Birmingham Phoenix season

Hello, OLLSZCZ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2023 Birmingham Phoenix season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:COLOR

On {{Norwich City F.C.}}, you changed the text of "Norwich City Football Club" to green from black. Whilst yellow and green are the NCFC colours, templates like this need to comply with MOS:COLOUR, in particular with colour contrasts, so those with less good sight can read the templates. Green text on a yellow background does not meet the colour contrast standards, so I have reverted back to black text on that template. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks for the heads up. OLLSZCZ (talk) 16:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]