User talk:NothingButTruthIndia
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, NothingButTruthIndia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! - Sitush (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Somnath Bharti
[edit]Hi, please see User:Sitush/Common#Scripts for the reason why we do not show Indic script names. There is a sort-of exception for places but not for people. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Somnath Bharti. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 00:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- Please can you discuss the alumni association presidency on the article talk page rather than reinstating it time and again. You were bold in adding it and you have been reverted - see WP:BRD. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 20:16, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Somnath Bharti may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *[https://twitter.com/attorneybharti Official Twitter]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Somnath Bharti, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 19:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
IIT Delhi Alumni
[edit]Your article creation here was unacceptable, sorry. I've merged it into a section at Indian Institute of Technology Delhi. Please can you read some policies, as listed below:
- WP:BLP
- WP:Notability (schools)
- WP:V
- WP:HONORIFIC
- WP:NPOV
- WP:SOAPBOX (regarding your promotion of Somnath Bharti)
Also please could you note that using capital letters as you did is considered to be SHOUTING. Words such as "President" should be spelled in that type of manner, not as "PRESIDENT".
I realise that you are new to the process. You may find it beneficial next time that you create an article to do so by using the Article creation wizard. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 20:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
[edit]Hi NothingButTruthIndia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Any chance...
[edit]...that you'd be willing to just stop editing, without making other editors go through the trouble of figuring out who you are a WP:SOCK of? Because you're obviously not a new user, you're obviously here to harrass other users, and you're clearly not interested in following many of Wikipedia's policies. No one with a name like yours is a new user (because it inherently belies a familiarity with Wikipedia and a belief that there are battlegrounds here), and the fact that your user page, your very second edit, already indicates that you were jumping into a pre-existing battle. Seriously, will it make you happy to waste all of your time? I'm honestly very close to just blocking you outright, but if you insist, I'll try to go through the due process and figure out what your previous or concurrent account is. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:23, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Somnath Bharti
[edit]Hi, where is your evidence for this removal? The source mentions the very same company that Bharti claimed to own in his election affidavit. - Sitush (talk) 09:14, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Hi Sitush, apparently things do appear very deceiving but that was the point. Some conman used his name and similar details to use his credibility to defame him and that's why the matter is subjudice.
April 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Somnath Bharti may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | predecessor1 = [[Ramakant Goswami]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Stop, drop, and roll
[edit]Hi NothingButTruthIndia, looking over your contributions, as well as your username, you seem to be here to right great wrongs. Maintaining a neutral point of view on Wikipedia is important, but the way you have gone about your edits amounts to tendentious editing: every single one of them seems to be related to painting Somnath Bharti in a more positive light. When one has strong opinions about a specific subject, it's generally a good idea to leave it alone on Wikipedia. Therefor, it is probably the best idea if you leave the article on Bharti, and any subject closely related to him, alone. Regards, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Somnath Bharti. Sitush (talk) 20:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)