Jump to content

User talk:NooNVentoo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, NooNVentoo!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
@Myrealnamm-alt Thanks for your support! Need your continuous support in my editing.
Cheers,
NooNVentoo (talk) 14:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, you seem familiar with Wikicode and those already, even I'm still not good at them. Have you used previous accounts before? Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 15:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to My Talk Page

[edit]

Hello! 👋 This is the talk page for NooNVentoo. Feel free to leave me a message here about anything related to Wikipedia. Whether it’s feedback, a question, or just a friendly hello, I’d love to hear from you! 😊

Guidelines for Posting

[edit]
  • Please sign your comments with ~~~~ (four tildes) to include your username and timestamp.
  • Keep discussions civil and constructive.
  • Avoid sharing personal or sensitive information.
  • New messages go at the bottom of the page.

Archives

[edit]

Old discussions may be archived to keep the page organized. If you're looking for a previous conversation, check the archives: [No archives yet].

Start a New Discussion

[edit]

To start a new discussion, click the “New section” button at the top of this page or add your comment below.

Thank you for visiting my talk page! 🚀

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shankar Jiwal (November 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CharlieMehta was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:NOTRESUME
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Charlie (talk) 17:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, NooNVentoo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Charlie (talk) 17:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, @CharlieMehta! Shankar Jiwal is a present DGP from Tamil Nadu. As I created from active live sources only. If there is anything above this, I will definitely update it, and at the same time, also update it if there is anything. Check the sources from government of Tamil Nadu. I was attaching below for your references. Please update me what I have to do next? Thanks
  1. Tamil Nadu Police
  2. https://www.tn.gov.in/detail_contact/6946/4
  3. https://eservices.tnpolice.gov.in/CCTNSNICSDC/ContactPoliceHeadquarters?64
NooNVentoo (talk) 18:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shankar Jiwal (November 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! @Jamiebuba I have researched it again, and getting back to you. Please have vision on Tamil Nadu Police page about Shankar Jiwal Tamil Nadu Police#cite note-4. I hope you may accept it that, He has notability, but some of his details are missing. Actually, I have added only all the details available with proper source. Let me know from you! Bye NooNVentoo (talk) 09:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If i don't get to review it on time some other editor will get to it. Jamiebuba (talk) 09:58, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I got it And need help on Wikipedia, is there any team or programs here Wikipedia or Wikimedia Foundation. If they're, please suggest me @Jamiebuba. Thank You! NooNVentoo (talk) 10:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

PSG College of Technology
added links pointing to NSS and NCC
CNN
added a link pointing to Multinational
Suryakumar Pandey
added a link pointing to Geet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shankar Jiwal (December 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Police DGPs are not inherently notable; notability is determined by substantial, independent coverage in reliable sources. The sources provided appear routine and do not demonstrate notability per WP:SIGCOV. For further guidance, please refer to the links provided in the decline notice.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:15, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WASP3D (December 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WASP3D (December 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NCOMPANY, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NooNVentoo&oldid=1264719824"