User talk:Noface1

Wednesday

27

November

21:32 UTC

'stub' status

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Smile

Thatperson has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

why do you agree? both of them are bigger than all of the banbury estate articles but i suppose many subsections on the speedcubing article would make it uber (possibly featured eventually)

§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Geniussansom

Hi. I have added all this seasons fixtures and results to the Banbury United page. --geniussansom 20:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

View this Southern Football League Premier Division 2006/07 --geniussansom 17:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leicester Tigers Premiership Table

Please may I add the Premiership table you created to the Northampton Saints page, to save me having to type it all out. Obviously I will update it myself. --geniussansom 16:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

english essay

In our english essay you wrote prolong a lot and i changed them to prelong. However, in the sense of it as you meant it it was prolong, so just scribble out the places where i wrote prelong. --geniussansom 16:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usefull pages

Template:TestTemplates

my userpage

view my new userpage. especially the banbury united userbox —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Geniussansom (talk • contribs) 19:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Grange School

On teh Grange page you wrote the deputy is Mrs Jelfs. She left last summer so I have deleted this info —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Geniussansom (talk • contribs) 18:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

fr:Équipe d'Angleterre de rugby à XV / England national rugby union team

Well I tried to look up information about a list of England national rugby union team notable former players with objective rules, its really hard to find. I need too a list of best top scorers ans a list of best tries scorer. I am looking for economic aspects of England national rugby union team : tv rights, coverture, how many english players in rugby union / football / cricket and other major sports in england...

Do you have some information to better english and french articles to do a featured article ?

Thanks a lot... Dd Ddfree 21:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EDF Energy Cup Final Attendance

Just out of interest, how did you find that total for the attendance at the EDF Energy Cup final? Both the tournament's official website and the BBC say the attendance was 60,000. Granted, this seems a little too precise, so I'm inclined to believe your figure, but I'm just curious as to how you came across it. Also, how did you get those awards on your Userpage? I've got over 1000 edits on Wikipedia and no one has given me diddly squat! PeeJay 01:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a couple of reminders...

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in User talk:Gyppo, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. U-Mos 18:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Leicester tigers badge.png

Hello, Noface1. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Leicester tigers badge.png) was found at the following location: User:Noface1. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 17:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coaches on the England national rugby union team page

Hey, where did you get the dates for the appointments of all the England coaches? Is there a reference you could add to the section? Thanks. - Shudda ^talk 05:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm definitely not disputing the list being correct! But having a reference is necessary if the article is ever to be a GA or FA. Do you know what book it was? Are you able to add a reference? - Shudda ^talk 23:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No a web page is definitely not necessary as a reference. In fact a book is preferable to a web page! If you could add the book to the bibliography section of the England page that would be great. It's best to use a consistent format, so I recommend the citation template {{cite book| title= |publisher= |place= |year= |first= |last= |isbn=}} A complete list of the templates can be found at WP:CITET. Any questions let me know. - Shudda ^talk 01:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for adding that. Do you know what page number it was? - Shudde ^talk 23:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The format I use is once I have added a book to the page's bibliography. I reference the page number but adding <ref name="AuthorPageNum">Author's surname (year of publication), pg number.</ref>. So for the book you are referring to, at the end of the introductory sentence on coaches I would add <ref>Farmer (2006), pg whatever.</ref>. Hopefully my explanation is good enough! - Shudde ^talk 00:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

England national rugby union team

I would definitely appreciate any help in getting the article to WP:FA status. It's slowly getting there. There are quite a few things that need to be done. What i'm doing is using France national rugby union team and All Blacks as the standards for the England article to aim to. So the layout and general format between the three should be very similar. If you look at the talk page for the England article there is a todo list there. One thing you could do is reformat the Current squad section. The format should be the same as the All Blacks current squad. I also think that the squad is now 40, not 47 players. The other thing that needs to be done is references need to be added to the history and Twickenham sections. Any refs you could add there would be greatly appreciated. - Shudde ^talk 00:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does the reference you used for the coaches list have information on individual records? Such as most appearances, youngest and oldest Test players. Things like that? I have most of the information, and some records change frequently (for example Jonny Wilkinson will keep scoring points) but most will prob chance rarely. Any help would be appreciated. - Shudde ^talk 04:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Rugby union national team Improvement Drive

For the 2007 Rugby World Cup WikiProject Rugby union is launching an Improvement Drive for national rugby union teams; specifically those participating in the Rugby World Cup.

We need your help! Here is what you can do:

Adopt a national rugby union team article and collaborate with other members to improve it.
Find, create and upload free images that will help improve these articles.
Copy-edit, reference, and expand articles when and where you can.
Promote the project and encourage others to join.

The World Cup is fast approaching and these articles are going to get a lot more hits during the tournament. It would be great if we could have them at a high standard!

For more information see the discussion on the WikiProject Rugby union talk page here.

Shudde ^talk 05:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Just a note to say thanks for that reference you added to England national rugby union team. The article has now been promoted to Featured Article status. Thanks again. - Shudde ^talk 01:17, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St Louis Meadow Park, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article St Louis Meadow Park, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of St Louis Meadow Park, Banbury. RMHED (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Easington Rec, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Easington Rec, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Easington Rec, Banbury. RMHED (talk) 00:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Horton View Sports Ground, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Horton View Sports Ground, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Horton View Sports Ground, Banbury.

Bankside Park, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bankside Park, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Bankside Park, Banbury. RMHED (talk) 00:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People's Park, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article People's Park, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of People's Park, Banbury. RMHED (talk) 00:52, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grange School, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Grange School, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St John's Roman Catholic Primary School

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article St John's Roman Catholic Primary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of King's Field Park

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article King's Field Park, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Horton View Sports Ground, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Horton View Sports Ground, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St John's Priory School, Banbury

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article St John's Priory School, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cherwell Heights

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cherwell Heights, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got a source for it- [[1]]. --86.29.134.254 (talk) 18:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adrian Rhymes

A tag has been placed on Adrian Rhymes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. XXX antiuser ^eh? 21:02, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adrian Rhymes

The article Adrian Rhymes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Only self-published hits on web search and nothing on news search.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Favonian (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Noface1! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jan-Mar 2007 050.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jan-Mar 2007 050.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First ever Oxford Wiki Meetup

You are invited to the first ever Oxford Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Four Candles, 51 George Street, Oxford, OX1 2BE on Sunday 4 November 2012 from 1.00 pm.

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Oxford related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Estates of Oxfordshire

Category:Estates of Oxfordshire, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 11:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Activate Learning

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Activate Learning, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BDD (talk) 17:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Noface1,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]