User talk:Noboyo/2021

FAC: Love for Sale (Bilal album)

Hi. Could you spare some time and review my nomination of this article? Here is the featured article criteria for guidance, in case you choose to do so. Thanks. isento (talk) 04:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chain Letter (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Karlsson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of songs recorded by No Angels, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Donovan Leitch and Goodbye to Yesterday.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

History (Thomas Anders album)

added links pointing to Brother Louie and Geronimo's Cadillac

Vibe (album)

added a link pointing to John Holliday

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Best of Brandy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Candice Nelson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Correct usage of {{certification Table Bottom}}

Hi Noboyo. I noticed some edits in which you added a certification table using the certification table templates, e.g. here. You might have missed it, but the bottom template is supposed to match the footnotes used in the table itself, see the correction I did here. Let me know if you need any assistance with that. As always, your contributions are much appreciated. Happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 13:28, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noboyo. You haven't responded in the past, but again I find myself correcting quite a number of your certification table edits, correcting the footnotes to match the table itself. Please be more careful with that. Happy New Year! Muhandes (talk) 10:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Love Signals

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Love Signals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 17:14, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Q, Mike, Slim, Daron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Casey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luther Vandross (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Toni braxon libra.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toni braxon libra.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ultimate Collection.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ultimate Collection.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Four Seasons Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Messehalle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited You Are (Atomic Kitten song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brandy (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interlude.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brokenhearted (Brandy song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milquetoast.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Forever and a Day.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Forever and a Day.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:NataleColeLeavinResize.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NataleColeLeavinResize.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeffrey Osborne (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis Johnson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Meggie Folchart.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Meggie Folchart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 11:22, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mo Folchart.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mo Folchart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 11:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Differences.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Differences.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't replace single covers with non-standard ones

This is not the first time you've done this either. File:Rockwitu.jpg is a zoomed-in version of the far more widely distributed international cover. When I search "Rock wit U (Awww Baby) cover", I don't even see this in the first few results (aside from the Wikipedia search result, which is your doing). Why you replaced it with this non-standard version I don't know. I, and I'm sure other editors if they were aware of you doing so, would appreciate it if you don't replace covers on Wikipedia with some non-standard version you apparently prefer. If this happens again I will be reporting you to somebody to get you to stop. Do some research on sites like Discogs and find out what the most common cover is before "replacing" them. It's not a difficult task. Thanks. Ss112 12:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your subjective opinion. I got the single myself and it looks 100% the same.

Thank you again for assuming something is my opinion. It's not; it's fact. Indulge me and take a look through the Discogs pages for "Rock wit U (Awww Baby)" and tell me how many of those are the zoomed-in cover. I found one, and that's the UK CD single. Besides the vinyl copies that do not have a cover, the rest are the original zoomed out cover where you can see most of Ashanti's body. What is your point in replying that you have the single with the cover you uploaded? That doesn't mean the CD single you possess is representative of most versions of that single, so stop replacing covers that have nothing wrong with them and are far more widely distributed and recognised than the one you have. Your version of the cover has been removed from the article. Thank you. Ss112 05:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"I, and I'm sure other editors if they were aware of you doing so, would appreciate [...]" – this is the opposite of a fact. Start speaking for yourself (and stop threatening!).

You're deliberately being oblivious at this point. The heading of this section is "don't replace single covers with non-standard ones". I told you the version you uploaded was not the most common version of the cover. I then provided you with proof: the Discogs link where you can see that most versions of the single carry the full picture of Ashanti's body, not the zoomed-in version of her face that you uploaded. That's what is a fact, and that's what I stated was a fact in my second message. I was definitively not referring to anything else I've said in this pointless argument with you. What part of anything I've said thus far constitutes not speaking for myself? I, and nobody else, am asking you to stop. That's the definition of speaking for myself. The one sentence you construe as not speaking for myself was my saying that if editors who upload cover artworks to Wikipedia were aware, they would not want you, or any other editor, to upload something that is clearly not the main cover of a single release. Why would they? The infobox is supposed to show the most widely distributed cover of a release. Congratulations on focusing on one part of what is now three messages to say something that is conclusively untrue.

My final point is: if you want to maintain a defiant attitude and refuse to stop uploading versions of covers that you find more pleasing or that you personally own, next time you upload one of these rare covers of a single that is not the main one, an administrator will be alerted. That's not a threat, Noboyo, that's a promise. You can mark my words on that. By all means, reply with something else you want to misconstrue. I'm speaking for myself when I say: stop this. Also, sign your comments, and clear this monstrosity of a talk page. Thank you. Ss112 09:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What goes around comes around. I don't maintain any attitude nor am I ignoring kind hints but your "stop or I'll report you" tone gives me heartburn.

Orphaned non-free image File:Der Junge, der rennt.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Der Junge, der rennt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Did It For Love.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Did It For Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CS-Spiegelbild.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CS-Spiegelbild.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Sun Shines Again.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Sun Shines Again.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:51, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Destiny's child-survivor(single).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Destiny's child-survivor(single).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Love Is Your Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Schwartz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Using student newspapers as sources

Regarding this edit you made to Elgin (album), please don't cite college students' opinions as if they're music critics, because they're not. See WP:RS. Their reviews are about as useful as citing a random blogger on Wordpress.

Also, if you can't prove an album's notability with news sources and the only citation you can provide for an album like I Dream of Christmas is an Apple Music link (note: it's no longer iTunes), then you should probably avoid creating an article for it. If this album does not chart or get any significant reviews, I will redirect the article. Norah Jones albums are not automatically notable just because they're by her. I'm sure you'll have something to say, so I await your snarky comeback. Ss112 00:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your wise words. Please, redirect it. I'm sure, you'll do the same with 30.

You're not sincerely comparing Adele's album guaranteed millions of sales with already widespread media coverage to some late-career Christmas album by Norah Jones that basically no music news source has gone into depth about let alone reviewed yet, are you? Where is the similarity? What is your point? Honestly you just have no clue at all. Ss112 02:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, your opinion is 100% subjective.

Again, not my opinion. These are facts: Adele sold over 20 million copies with her last album in 2015. Norah Jones hasn't even sold one million copies of one of her albums in nine years (since 2012). There's no comparison between the two and you still lack any trace of a clue. Start creating your articles with more than one source or I'll redirect them when I come across them. Happy editing. Ss112 07:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"(...) to some late-career Christmas album" – this IS your opinion. What enables you to foresee what will be a success and what not? Nothing. Happy editing yourself.

Do not use Template:Rating when a website does not award stars. You can clearly see PopMatters' website gave it 8/10, not 8 stars out of 10. And you appear to have absolutely no clue what an opinion is. Again. You again quoted me saying something that has nothing to do with what you then proceed to try and come back at me about. Tragic. Please learn basic English terms before arguing with me, or anyone, in future. Funny that you talk about "success" and yet you have made no edits to the article you created that actually demonstrate supposed "success". If it's so successful why did you only add an Apple Music citation when you created it and have since only added one review? If anything, I've done more to demonstrate any notability it might have than you. Ss112 15:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Tragic. Please learn basic behaviour before arguing with me, or anyone, in future. I don't see any use in arguing with you. If I want to experience passive-aggressive bitching, then I use other mediums.

"I don't see any use in arguing with you." Yet you're still replying to me, and I bet you will after this. You also use a line I just said and still have the hide to call me tragic. "Lol." Again: Start demonstrating the notability of articles you create when you create them, even the forgettable little '90s R&B albums you create articles for, or I'll keep bitching at you for forgetting WP:NALBUMS and redirect them if all you can provide is one Apple Music citation. And considering I'm the only user who bothers to say anything to you here on the 500-thread quagmire you call a talk page, you know that's a promise, Nobby. Ss112 01:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Eternal-Someday.JPG

The file File:Eternal-Someday.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

More than one cover art of the Eternal version used, conflicting with WP:NFCC#3a. Preferring the other image by default...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]