User talk:NireshaJAththa

This is NireshaJAththa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonas Becker (musician) (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

Discography needs more sources before it can be accepted. Perhaps some secondary sources about his releases can be used? When that's fixed, feel free to put it up for review again and it would probably be accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonas Becker (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NireshaJAththa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jonas Becker (musician)

Hello, NireshaJAththa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jonas Becker (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jonas Becker (musician)

Hello, NireshaJAththa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jonas Becker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruhire (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruhire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 23:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michelle Dilhara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WWF. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Weerya film poster.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Weerya film poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --TheImaCow (talk) 21:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ruhire

Hello, NireshaJAththa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruhire, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keerthi Pasquel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baila.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chanuka Wijesundara

The article Chanuka Wijesundara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources all appear to be WP:PRIMARY either interviews with the subject or clear press release republications

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chanuka Wijesundara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chanuka Wijesundara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanuka Wijesundara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles on Sri Lanka

Hi there, NireshaJAththa, and thank you for writing so many articles about Sri Lanka, especially films. I have just been looking at your creations on X-tools, reviewing and assessing as necessary. Well done!--Ipigott (talk) 06:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Netherlands national cricket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jonas Becker (musician)

Hello NireshaJAththa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jonas Becker (musician) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mach61 00:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Senaka Batagoda

In discographies, album names are italicized, not singles. If you don't know the correct formatting please look up an example, see Sting discography. Will you please correct your mistake? Chanaka L (talk) 16:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Jonas Becker (musician)

Hello NireshaJAththa, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jonas Becker (musician), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonas Becker (musician).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cabrils}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cabrils (talk) 05:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 17:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo Travels moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Buffalo Travels. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Camilear (talk) 17:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NireshaJAththa. Thank you for your work on Jagath Wickremerathna. Another editor, GrabUp, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

The economynext source mention the name “Jagath Wickremaratne”. But SundayTimes’s spelling matches with the current title.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 14:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GrabUp: Both Wickremaratne and Wickremerathna are just spelling differences. Both are commonly used in Sri Lanka. Sometime, it is written as Wickramaratne as well. NireshaJAththa (talk) 15:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got it, created redirect from these. GrabUp - Talk 15:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NireshaJAththa. Thank you for your work on Pathmasiri Bandara. Another editor, GrabUp, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

SundayTimes mentions Padmasiri Bandara.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 14:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GrabUp: Similar to the previous spelling difference. NireshaJAththa (talk) 15:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi NireshaJAththa. Thank you for your work on G. D. Suriyabandara. Another editor, GrabUp, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Sources are naming D. Suriyabandara as ‘G’. The mention of ‘G’ on the army website might be a short form of ‘General.’ I recommend moving this article to the title mentioned in the sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 15:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GrabUp: Check army websites. It is given as "farewell to Major General GD Sooriyabandara USP", so it cannot be "G" for general. NireshaJAththa (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I see. GrabUp - Talk 15:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]