User talk:Nils2088

Hello, Nils2088, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 18:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

January 2024

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Star Wars video games, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 14:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Hundred Years of Solitude (2024 series) (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

Draft is weak. Much better coverage can be found in One Hundred Years of Solitude. Cut and paste the section to there (acknowledging the source in the exit comment) and start from there.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One Hundred Years of Solitude (2024 series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 09:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nils2088! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 09:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

I noticed that you added a bare URL as a reference in the article Dune: Prophecy, as seen here. Bare URLs are uninformative and vulnerable to link rot. Please convert it to a full citation to ensure the article remains verifiable and maintains a consistent citation style. If you need help, see introduction to referencing. Isaidnoway (talk) 16:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Hundred Years of Solitude (2024 series) (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One Hundred Years of Solitude (2024 series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Your edit to Draft:One Hundred Years of Solitude (2024 series) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 13:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Hundred Years of Solitude (2024 series) (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One Hundred Years of Solitude (2024 series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Absurd Ventures

Hello, Nils2088. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Absurd Ventures, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at Nosferatu (2024 film)

In this edit, you restored an earlier plot synopsis that just copied the film's studio's promotional blurb. We try to avoid promotion here at Wikipedia, which is why I had removed that in the first place. Can you explain why you prefer the studio's promotion over the more neutral synopsis? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:35, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found the new version messy to read and too extensive, more of a synopsis it felt like an incomplete plot of the film with incoherent order and data . Also, no sources were given to the plot it described. It just didn't obbey the standard of what a Wikipedia synopsis is expeted to be like. Maybe we should get the arbitration comittee? Or I could trim down the current version if souces are given to the origin of it. Nils2088 (talk) 21:08, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the ArbCom needs to be alerted. This is a simple content dispute. I don't think plot summaries need sourcing; the film itself is the source for the plot. We can certainly trim it down and clean it up, but we should certainly not use the studio's own promotion as article content. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:28, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, however the film has only screened for press, official release in the US is on the 25th. There's no way to prove the synopsis is accurate. I do agree that we shouldn't use the studio's own marketing, but whatever premise we use should be from a trustworthy source. Maybe the trades have something. I'll look for something there and I'll let you know what I've found. Nils2088 (talk) 22:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That being the case, I recommend removing the section entirely until the film has been released. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:One Hundred Years of Solitude (2024 series)

Hello, Nils2088. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:One Hundred Years of Solitude (2024 series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]