Jump to content

User talk:Nije bitno...

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Nije bitno..., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Image Tagging Image:Commie.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Commie.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Kaiserb 04:24, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Lepi su ti ovi clanci o crnogorskim gradovima, ali brate pobrisase ti ljudi sve slike. Jel ti treba pomoc oko toga? Nikola 11:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why remove Podgorica map?

[edit]

I am wondering why you removed the map from the Podgorica article. I firmly believe that most native English-speakers are very unfamiliar with the Balkans and a map is indispensible. I will revert Podgorica to its earlier version. Thanks. Madman 19:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uhhh

[edit]

What's this arguement regrding the Montenegrins article? --HolyRomanEmperor 17:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ansuman patnaik

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions do not assert the notability of their subjects and have been reverted or removed. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --W.marsh 13:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong liscenses

[edit]

Almost all your images have the wrong liscense. If you don't find an appropriate one, they will be deleted. Sasquatch t|c 22:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CG Wikipedia

[edit]

Hey Nije bitno..., there is currently a vote for a version of Wikipedia in Montenegrin. If you want to vote, go to meta:Requests for new languages. There you can vote. Ask your friends on Wikipedia (if you have any) who haven't voted to vote. Thanks. Crna Gora (Talk/Contribs/Edit Count) 21:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Milo Djukanovic

[edit]

I saw your message on the Milo Djukanovic talk page. I agree that the article is biased against him. I actually removed some of it in my edits on June 6, but there is still a lot left. I look forward to seeing your upcoming edits to the article. Just be careful to cite sources and don't delete all the criticisms. Academic Challenger 22:42, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BudvaRivieraMap.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Sozina_tunnel.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sozina_tunnel.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please...

[edit]

Please read up WP:POV and WP:NPOV. You don't follow those rules... --HolyRomanEmperor 08:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decimalna tačka

[edit]

Aj' molim te nemoj mijenjati decimalne tačke u zareze. Ovo je engleska vikipedija. Duja 14:39, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ma ok što se podataka tiče, neću ni da provjeravam., ti podaci su bili kupljeni ko zna iz kojih preliminarnih izvora... http://www.njegos.cg.yu čini mi se. Mislio sam da si krenuo da sistematski "ispraviš" zareze pa reko' da te spriječim dok nisi "popravio" sve. Duja 14:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dobro

[edit]

Pogledaj Talk:Podgorica_Assembly, brate sokole.

P. S. - da kazem nesto o sebi - razgovaras s jednom osobom koja je tu negdje u medji izmedju bjelasa i zelenasa, izmedju Dukljo-montenegrina i Srba, izmedji indipendista i pro-unionista. Posto je nasa (za mene porijeklom) zemlja uvijek bila Montenegro: the Divided Land kako kaze jedan veliki engleski pisac, uvijek sam se drzao u medji. Razumijes? --HolyRomanEmperor 15:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MontenegroRoadMap.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your attempt to change the license on this image. There's no evidence for either {{CopyrightedFreeUse}} or {{GFDL}} because you haven't given us the source of the image. You say it's from "DBO Advertising Agency." Is this image online somewhere? Did you scan it from a map? What makes you think either of those licenses applies? Thanks. howcheng {chat} 06:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It depends on the copyright laws in Montenegro, but I'm guessing that because it's relatively recent, DBO owns the copyright to the image. You used their image and in U.S. law, copyright extends to derivative works, meaning your version is still covered under their copyright (I don't know the specifics of Montenegro law but I'll bet it's similar). The only way you can create a similar map is to start with a free use version (such as Image:Montenegro municipalities.png) and draw the cities and roads on. Does that make sense? Good luck. howcheng {chat} 15:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bojan Marovic.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bojan Marovic.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 13:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia in Montenegrin language

[edit]

Predpostavljam da će te ovo zanimati. Glasuje se za pokretanje Wikipedije na crnogorskom jeziku. Pogledaj poveznicu [1]. Kubura 07:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:RibnicaBridge.jpg

[edit]
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:RibnicaBridge.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 12:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:RomanSquareNight.jpg

[edit]
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:RomanSquareNight.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 12:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MilleniumBridgeNight.jpg

[edit]
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MilleniumBridgeNight.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 12:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:SvetiStefan.jpg

[edit]
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:SvetiStefan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 12:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:NiksicCoat.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:NiksicCoat.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 13:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:CoatBA.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:CoatBA.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MontenegroRoadMap.jpg

[edit]
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MontenegroRoadMap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 07:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MaximusNightclub

[edit]

MaximusNightclub.gif seems to be empty, so I've nommed it for speedy. --David Mestel(Talk) 19:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so the .gif can be deleted. --David Mestel(Talk) 20:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

template

[edit]

I have moved TemplateMontenegrin First League to Template:Montenegrin First League. -- RHaworth 19:30, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Pitanje...

[edit]

Kad je Kralj Nikola napisa ONAMO NAMO,da li je sebe smatra Srbinom ili necim drugim??

Onamo pokoj naci cu dusi,kad Srbin vise ne bude rob...


E zato ste jadni i bedni,dodji vamo u Vasojevice da vidjis kaka je ova vasa nezavisna drzava oca vam jebem izdajnickog ,izdali ste i Kralja Nikolu i sebe

Potpisi se (kucaj Nije bitno... 09:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)). I opusti se malo...[reply]

Pozdrav od kolege

[edit]

Sto se cini? E'o nista... Skoci ponekad kad nadjes malo vremena na Montenegrins, Montenegrin language, Petar I Petrovic Njegos, Knjaz Danilo itd. Pokusavam neke stvari da pomjerim ali ide dosta mucno.Momisan 12:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bar-Position.PNG

[edit]

It's great that you updated Montenegro maps. However, there seems to be a problem with Image:Bar-Position.PNG. I don't see the image neither in Firefox nor in IE6, although the thumb in Commons:Category:Maps of Montenegro is OK. I'm not sure whether it's something wrong with my browser, or the image was corrupted somehow (it's the first in alphabetic order); could you check and re-upload if necessary? Duja 07:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed Berane, Kotor, Andrijevica and Mojkovac images; I don't know what was wrong, but they didn't display correctly in the articles, so I just re-exported and re-uploaded them. Duja
[edit]
An image that you uploaded, Image:MaximusNightclub.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Indon (reply) — 02:30, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

[edit]

Hey, Nije Bitno, what's up. I needed a favor from you since you started up that Vraka article. Can you dig up some information on Montenegrins in Albania for me because apparently you know about it more than I do. Thanks again. Bye --Crna Gora 20:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CG Wiki

[edit]

I've started up a CG Wiki at cgwiki.elwiki.com (it'll become a seperate website once it gets 10 articles, and it's for free). If you would like, you can join it (you can become a bureaucrat and a SysOp), though I will need extreeeeeeme heeeeeeeeelp!!!!!!!. And, it's written in the Montenegrin language as intended. Think about it and if yes, come join and help out. Please, just do follow the rules of the Montenegrin language on the wiki when contributing. Bye. --Crna Gora 04:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:CoatBD.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 13:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Montenegrin Wikipedia

[edit]

| Montenegrin Wikipedia Proposal Please vote.Cheers! Sideshow Bob 23:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Logo-TelecomMontenegro.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo-TelecomMontenegro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:PGairport exterior 2.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:PGairport exterior 2.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:T-Com logo.gif)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:T-Com logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Dan-logo.jpg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dan-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:440_pogled_ajfelovog_tornja.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Debate on the correct adjective for Kosovo

[edit]

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion 15:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In this article it is writen how Montenegro has become part of Yugoslavia. Now I from Croatia and Pax from Serbia are having discussion about that. In my thinking we need Montenegrin users to write about Montenegro. Be free to enter discussion on talk page. -—Rjecina 15:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A View from the Eiffel Tower - Gramatika i Speling

[edit]

Zdravo, molim te pogledaj strnicu koju si napravio A View from the Eiffel Tower. Popravio sam neke greske u gramatici i speling-u, ako ima nekih drugih podataka kojih si dodao na wikipediju, molim te reci mi, mogu i te malo projevriti. Pozdrav. Zlatko 21:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:LYPG diagram.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:LYPG diagram.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 12:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VektraLogo.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:VektraLogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KKBuducnost.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:KKBuducnost.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, your edit to the Montenegro page has been reverted by another editor and then by me. The language of Montenegro is highly contested and the first sentence is a compromise agreement after discussion on the talk page. If you wish to change it, may I ask that you go to the talk page. Thanks. Woody (talk) 11:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dan-logo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dan-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi Nije bitno...!
We thank you for uploading Image:LYPG diagram.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:PGairport.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://maps.google.com/maps?t=h&q=42.142778,19.046667&ie=UTF8&ll=42.358734,19.249163&spn=0.040211,0.075531&z=14&iwloc=addr. As a copyright violation, Image:PGairport.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:PGairport.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:PGairport.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:PGairport.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:PGairport.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Niels? en | nl 15:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Plantaze-logo.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:PG neighbourhoods.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this image on the List of Podgorica neighbourhoods and suburbs article and I must mention that the imagery on Google Earth is copyrighted and so are all works derising from it. It would be best to create a SVG image of municipality borders without the overlay to bypass the copyright requirements. Admiral Norton (talk) 12:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zašto?

[edit]

Zašto nemate korisničku stranicu na sr: wikipediji? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boskoigic (talkcontribs) 18:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smatrao sam da je prioritet napraviti kvalitetnu englesku verziju, jer je ona ipak najviše korišćena, najviše prevođena na druge jezike i sl. Upravo je i u zapadnim zemljama prisutno najmanje informacija i najviše predrasuda kad je Balkan u pitanju, pa sam iz tog razloga davao doprinos uglavnom EN wikipediji. Nije bitno... (talk) 11:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

[edit]

An article of yours is in AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximus (nightclub). Joe Chill (talk) 17:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Coat of Arms of Kotor. Firstly thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic one which we already have a page - [[:{{{article}}}]]. Your enthusiasm is fantastic, but unfortunately your article has been nominated for deletion in accordance with our policies. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we'd love for you to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:{{{article}}}]] - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:{{{article}}}|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest this deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article you created (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on Talk:Coat of Arms of Kotor explaining your position, although an administrator may still believe deletion to be necessary. Regardless, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, as doing such often creates unnecessary confusion. If you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Hang in there and try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.

ShadowRanger (talk|stalk) 18:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Nije bitno...! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Ivan Strugar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Visa

[edit]

Hey, what's up? I wanted to ask you if there is a way to have different version of Star Alliance page. What I mean is all the info we gather for Visa is from this web site: http://www.staralliance.com/en/services/visa-and-health/

But now when you click "Get Information" it shows at the same page so you can't link it like this one: http://www.timaticweb.com/cgi-bin/tim_website_client.cgi?SpecData=1&VISA=1&HEALTH=1&NA=RS&AR=00&DE=BD&EM=RS&TR=00&VT=00&PASSTYPES=TYPE&user=STAR&subuser=STAR

Any solutions? Rave92(talk) 11:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:KAPlogo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KAPlogo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 08:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bojan Marovic.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Bojan Marovic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NortyNort (Holla) 11:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LAM-logo.JPG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LAM-logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:27, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cineplexx Cinemas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —EncMstr (talk) 04:25, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Vijesti-5June2006.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vijesti-5June2006.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tivat Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crosswinds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:30, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hotel Splendid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Varvari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C679 07:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:BudvaRivieraMap.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewFlagPG.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NewFlagPG.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:30, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:NewFlagPG.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:NewFlagPG.jpg, which you've attributed to Srdjan Marlovic. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Podgorica Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2000s (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tivat Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Tivat airport is located right next to the city of [[Tivat]], {convert|7|km|mi|abbr=on}} from the center of [[Kotor]], and some {{convert|19|km|mi|0|abbr=on}} north-west of [[Budva]], one

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:44, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Budva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avars. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Budva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petrovac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:DeltaMontenegro.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:DeltaMontenegro.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Demographics of Podgorica) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Demographics of Podgorica, Nije bitno...!

Wikipedia editor Human3015 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Human3015's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

File permission problem with File:NewCoatPG.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:NewCoatPG.jpg, which you've attributed to Srdjan Marlovic[who?]. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Nije bitno.... Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pruga Podgorica - Nikšić

[edit]

Nije bitno, može li se znati izvor odakle je pisan članak? Napisao bih o pruzi članak na hr.wikipediji, ali sam što se tiče izvora - nula bodova. Prvenstveno mislim na tehničke značajke pruge, ali i ostalo.--MaGa 11:00, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Nije bitno.... Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ej, vidi ovo!

[edit]

Ne briši [[2]]. Lijep pozdrav Uspjeh je ključ života (talk) 13:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Podgorica Aluminium Plant logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Podgorica Aluminium Plant logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:36, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VOLI company logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VOLI company logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:40, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Plantaze-logo.JPG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Plantaze-logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:35, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Nije bitno.... Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Podgorica Montenegro.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Budva Montenegro.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]