User talk:Niceking1234

January 2025

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Alexander Hummerhielm, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Alexander Hummerhielm where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Galaxybeing (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 14:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the same person as Gilberatalessandro054. Gilberatalessandro054 is my wiki friend. I should not be banned because of this as I only have one wiki account in my possession. Niceking1234 (talk) 03:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Niceking1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Niceking1234(me/I) am not the same person as Gilberatalessandro054. Gilberatalessandro054 is a wikipedia friend of mine and I do not own his account and he in turn does not own my account either. I do not deserve to be blocked this way. I only have 1 wiki account in my possession and I only use this one account as well. Please, I hope this message can be read by the admins and wikipedia instructors. Thank You.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Niceking1234(me/I) am not the same person as Gilberatalessandro054. Gilberatalessandro054 is a wikipedia friend of mine and I do not own his account and he in turn does not own my account either. I do not deserve to be blocked this way. I only have 1 wiki account in my possession and I only use this one account as well. Please, I hope this message can be read by the admins and wikipedia instructors. Thank You. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Niceking1234(me/I) am not the same person as Gilberatalessandro054. Gilberatalessandro054 is a wikipedia friend of mine and I do not own his account and he in turn does not own my account either. I do not deserve to be blocked this way. I only have 1 wiki account in my possession and I only use this one account as well. Please, I hope this message can be read by the admins and wikipedia instructors. Thank You. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Niceking1234(me/I) am not the same person as Gilberatalessandro054. Gilberatalessandro054 is a wikipedia friend of mine and I do not own his account and he in turn does not own my account either. I do not deserve to be blocked this way. I only have 1 wiki account in my possession and I only use this one account as well. Please, I hope this message can be read by the admins and wikipedia instructors. Thank You. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Niceking1234 (talk) 04:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC) Niceking1234 (talk) 04:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this does not account for the information presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gilberatalessandro054. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]