User talk:Navid1366

Welcome!

Hello, Navid1366, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Watseka wonder, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Phearson (talk) 04:14, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Watseka wonder

The article Watseka wonder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:FRINGE, Please provide WP:RS for this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Phearson (talk) 04:14, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Watseka wonder

The article Watseka wonder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Urban legend that whose facts are not verifiable by third-party sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Strikerforce (talk) 04:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Navid1366. You have new messages at Phearson's talk page.
Message added 04:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Watseka wonder

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Watseka wonder, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Strikerforce (talk) 04:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Phearson (talk) 04:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Watseka wonder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Watseka wonder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watseka wonder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Strikerforce (talk) 04:51, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:56, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A note about reliable sources

Hi! As a general rule, messageboard forums are typically not considered reliable sources for Wikipedia. If, by chance, a subject is discussed in a forum thread and the information is sourced in that thread, then it is preferred that the source of the information be cited, rather than the thread. Strikerforce (talk) 06:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The hangon tag does not apply to Watseka wonder

FYI - The {{hangon}} tag does not apply to the Watseka wonder, at the present time. The tag is only applicable to articles that are nominated as candidates for speedy deletion (CSD), not those which are currently being discussed at AfD, as this article is currently. Please do not readd the hangon tag.

Also, I have now copy-edited the article twice for proper grammar. Please do not make any grammatical changes to the article as it currently stands. I will continue to help you with the grammar, if you would like. Strikerforce (talk) 07:55, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How can i solve this problem and how to prevent this error.I have mentioned different sources but still this warning has not changed.--Navid1366 (talk) 09:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.--Navid1366 (talk) 09:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC) (March 2011)--Navid1366 (talk) 09:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Possessed (2009 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Possessed (2009 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Possessed (2009 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 11:04, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Navid1366. You have new messages at Phearson's talk page.
Message added 15:36, 20 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Per WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT I need to clarify something to you, since it appears that you do not understand WP:BURDEN.You need to add these sources to the article. You need to put in-line citations into the article. You can remove the tags yourself if you believe you have fixed the problem. Phearson (talk) 16:23, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images that you uploaded

I'm surprised that you haven't received a message from one of the bots yet, but there is a problem with the images that you uploaded for use in the Watseka Wonder article. While I agree with your fair-use rationale, you still need to provide other information - specifically, the source that you got the photos from - in the template on the file pages in order for them to remain on Wikipedia. There are several bots that automatically remove images without a full rationale after a certain time period, so you'll want to do this rather quickly.

I commend you on your continued work on the article, by the way! I have had several editors lately who have done nothing but complain and argue after their articles were sent to AfD. You, on the other hand, have made continued attempts to better the article and make sure that it doesn't get deleted (or at least stands a better chance of survival), rather than complain. Much respect! I have made a couple of changes to the article, in terms of layout, that make it a bit easier to read. Keep up the good work! Strikerforce (talk) 18:11, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Resilient Barnstar

		The Resilient Barnstar
		As a token of appreciation for your attitude toward the ongoing process regarding the Watseka Wonder article and your continued effort toward improving it, rather than portraying a negative attitude at AfD, I would like to honor you with The Resilient Barnstar (the first that I have given out in my 2+ years as a registered user, by the way)! Strikerforce (talk) 18:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gashole

Thanks for contributing new article Gashole. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 07:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Thanks for notification. Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page.--Navid1366 (talk) 13:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quotation Removal

I removed the quote because it does not appear to add anything to the article. It is not a famous quote or anything widely cited by the media or anyone else. It is rather generic and actually reads more like a selling point for a book or something. Beach drifter (talk) 20:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. To reiterate, I have been removing the quote because it is not relevant, it is not important, it adds nothing to the article, this woman is not known for saying this quote. It is not my opinion, I have nothing against this person, I have just been trying to keep the article inline with wikipedia standards, or else the entire article may be deleted. Beach drifter (talk) 14:13, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have finally taken the time to look into the person in question here. The content I have been finding at about.com and the other sites you have listed is ENTIRELY promotional. She is trying to sell books and dvds. Beach drifter (talk) 14:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kimberly Amadeo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kimberly Amadeo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Amadeo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beach drifter (talk) 23:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Ashraf and her husband.jpeg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:21, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ashraf and her husband.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Ashraf and her husband.jpeg, which you've attributed to https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%BE%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87:%D8%A7%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%81_%D9%BE%D9%87%D9%84%D9%88%D9%8A_%D8%AF%D8%B1_%D9%83%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D9%87%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%B4_%D8%A7%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF_%D8%B4%D9%81%D9%8A%D9%82.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]