User talk:Navalpath

Welcome!

Hello, Navalpath, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Anal bombardment, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ironholds (talk) 06:04, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anal bombardment

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Anal bombardment, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 06:04, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anal bombardment, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Anal bombardment was changed by Navalpath (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-01-06T06:12:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Talk:George W. Bush. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Manway (talk) 06:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Anus-stub

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Anus-stub, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 06:50, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Anus stubs

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Category:Anus stubs, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 06:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Navalpath for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 07:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting my pages

I do not understand why you people are deleting my stuff. There are lots of articles on Wikipedia about about sexual positions and stuff. Navalpath (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but writing those requires a great deal of discretion. The text in the articles you've created on the topic was far from that. Materialscientist (talk) 07:04, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by discretion, I said what anal bombardment was, and I made a category and template for it. Navalpath (talk) 07:06, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See, there's List of sex positions, Dirty Sanchez (sexual act), Pearl necklace (sexuality), and all the stuff in Category:Sexuality stubs. Navalpath (talk) 07:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(i) That something exists on wikipedia (WP) is never a proof or support that another article may resemble that - WP is work in progress. (ii) What you wrote on the discussed topic did sound as personal opinion. As I mention, the topic is tricky to write on, and, in particular, one has to support their claims by reliable references. Materialscientist (talk) 07:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Materialscientist, particularly regarding reliable references. Until/unless the term has received significant coverage, it should not have a Wikipedia page. The article you created showed no evidence of coverage in secondary sources. —C.Fred (talk) 18:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

eMail me

Hey Navelpath! I cannot find you're eMail adress on you're talk page so either edit your talk page to display you're eMail adress or eMail me at Bob_thegamepro@hotmail.co.uk . Cheers! Bob_thegamepro Bob thegamepro (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]