User talk:Nashhinton

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Hello, Nashhinton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Young Earth creationism does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of Vi{retired}}ew policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 21:00, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nashhinton

This is Will just got your message, I copy and pasted your statement here so we can continue a dialogue if need be...

No offense, but I thought your last edit on the article "Christian Eschatology" was careless. You say "cite sources", yet you brought up a previous article that lacks citations and sources, just as the previous article lacked sources. There's more to christian eschatology than what the current page says. Just out of curiosity, is there a better previous edit that you can find? If so that would be appreciated. Thanks.

PS If you need to speak to me, just send me a personal message. Thanks. Nashhinton

First off no offense taken. Regarding your statement as the version I brought up lacks sources, yes I agree, but it has about the same amount of sources at the other version and it is 1/5 the size. Thus, I'm trimming the original research. I 100% agree that what I reverted to is not an A++ article quality, but it is starting point, where concerned users such as yourself who are looking to improve the article can add material and build the article up.

Regarding your question "Just out of curiosity, is there a better previous edit that you can find?" I really can't find one. I'm simply looking for cited material, and the past versions generally lack such. Also hopefully a balance can be added to this article. Thanks & hope no offense was taken. Willfults (talk)

Discussion moved to article talk space

I have moved the discussion about your concern with the article on the Intelligent design movement to that article's discussion page. Discussion of improvements or changes to particular articles gets more appropriate exposure in the relevant article's talk space. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 13:55, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Social Darwinism

I saw your discussion with user Rjensen and thought you'd be interested in knowing who he is and what he's written. This, of course, doesn't make him an expert. :) (I actually disagree with quite a bit of what he's written.) Yopienso (talk) 20:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nephilim

Is the KJV translating nephilim as "giants" in Gen.6:4? That seems to link up with Numbers, where the nephilim are clearly giants ("we were as grasshoppers in their sight", the spies report to Moses). So I imagine that's why the KJV editors translated "nephilim" as "giants". So did the translators of the Greek Septuagint, which the KJV editors had at their elbows. Reasonable enough.

You might like to look at Victor Hamilton's commentary on Genesis where he talks about this verse - see pages 261 and following. You'll also find a little bit in Townley's commentary, around page 79 - not so useful as Hamilton, but worth reading.

One of the great commentaries, one that can't be avoided, is Von Rad: See Von Rad, pages 113 onward. A bit dense, but worth re-reading till you get all he has to say.

Clearer perhaps is Matthews, p.335 and after. He notes that one possible meaning of "nephilim" is warriors who had fallen in battle (that's meaning of the very similar word in Ezekiel). It's only a guide, though - the nephilim in Numbers are very much alive, as are the ones in Genesis. Matthews is probably the first one you should read, and Von Rad the last.

All up, the KJV editors were translating Nephilim as "giants" because the Greek text did it that way, and the Greeks did it that way because the nephilim in Numbers are clearly giants, but nephilim means "fallen ones", and the nephilim in Numbers aren't "fallen", and nobody really knows what the word meant.PiCo (talk) 08:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Sorry - I actually had links to all those books, but they dropped out for some reason).

Scorpio keywords

They've been removed, now by two editors, as they lack any sources. Take it to the talk page if you have sources that meet our criteria at WP:RS but any addition would need attribution as well, as we can't state as a fact that there is a certain set of keywords. Dougweller (talk) 09:51, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Education, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Habits (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of speech = New WikiProject

WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech

Hi there, I'm notifying you as I saw your userspace links to {{User free speech}}. I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:

List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 23:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the emphasis is on price (value)

I understand exactly what you meant by tagging on quality. Why not also say quantity? Those things are implicit in goods and services. It's actually misleading to put quality there. In a free market EVERYTHING is determined through subjective values. That's what distinguishes it from bureaucracy that try to find objective values. That's what a price is. Mises' criticism of controlled markets is there lack of price system. The emphasis in the economic laws of supply and demand is price. This seems like a minor point but you should take quality thing out dude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rothbardanswer (talk • contribs) 16:06, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cultural anarchism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cultural anarchism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural anarchism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Taroaldo (talk) 23:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cultural anarchism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drug use (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prevention of dementia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neurotic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nashhinton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ten horns of the Beast (Revelation)

Hello Nashhinton,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ten horns of the Beast (Revelation) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mark^Dask 23:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's fine, I just like testing the waters whenever I create articles that come to mind.

However, It wasn't meant to be self-promotional and I thought it was pretty objective. It probably wasn't a necessary article (I don't want to waste data for Wikipedia servers). I'm a secular Biblical scholar (an atheist and I'm fascinated with religious texts).

I do think the text about the ten horns is very ambiguous. If it was actually self-promotional, I wouldn't have added various Christian viewpoints into the article.

In my honest opinion, I think the article is a failed prophecy regarding the disintegration of the Roman Empire during John's time and was rehashed from another failed prophecy written by the author of the book of Daniel. Nashhinton (talk) 02:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nashhinton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm Calton. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Donald Trump have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Calton | Talk 06:26, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Saturn Myth

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. Nashhinton, thanks for creating The Saturn Myth!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. If many contemporary scientists have opinions on the books, I hope you can find some of their reviews or writing on it and then include that as a reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to American Medical Association. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 00:02, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nashhinton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Greatest Depression moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Greatest Depression, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 00:23, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Greatest Depression (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by David.moreno72 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Greatest Depression and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Greatest Depression, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 07:35, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nashhinton! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 07:35, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Fascism, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:35, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:The Greatest Depression

Draft:The Greatest Depression, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Greatest Depression and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:The Greatest Depression during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 15:37, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

YVM

I reverted your additions on Yellow vests movement because adding descriptors like "plutocracy", "revolutionary" is not really necessary. If you have an article focusing on "assaults" (convictions for assault, for example) that could be a good add. No harm meant. (I did not mean to mark the first revert as "minor", I misclicked on twinkle, my apologies for that.) SashiRolls ^{t · c} 21:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks Nashhinton (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Second Dark Ages

The article Second Dark Ages has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NEO. Article on neologism with no sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CataracticPlanets (talk) 02:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you mediate?

Hi, i see you're an experienced author, are you, or another author of your acquaintance, able to mediate a 'no personal attacks' dispute? Details are on the most recent talk page of Presumption of guilt Crawiki (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Magnetic power moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Magnetic power, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoothSift 05:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economic bubble, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magnetic power (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Magnetic power instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This material is already covered in depth at articles such as Electromagnetism and Magnetic induction.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Magnetic power and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Magnetic power, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GirthSummit _(blether) 16:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2020 world currency crisis

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as 2020 world currency crisis, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Schazjmd (talk) 23:30, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please use sandbox

Hi, you said on Talk:2020 world currency crisis "Go ahead and delete. Just messing around". Please don't do that on mainspace articles. You can use your sandbox to experiment or even create subpages in your userspace to try out different things or to develop articles. Thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 23:57, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I just wanted to drop you a note to let you know that you are banned from posting comments on my talk page, unless, of course, you are required to by Wikipedia policy. If you are required to post a notice on my talk page, please clearly indicate in the edit summary what policy you are doing so under. Any other posted comments will be deleted without being read.

Please note that this ban also applies to pinging me. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:48, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Nice talking to you Ken. Nashhinton (talk) 06:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please just preview your comments instead of constantly refactoring? El_C 07:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have warned you 2 to quit commenting on my page and stalking me. Leave me alone. Thanks Nashhinton (talk) 07:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Go away! This is my talk page. You can not come here, harass me, and tell me to stop refactoring, when you're the main one doing it. Nashhinton (talk) 08:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Your recent editing history at Dark Enlightenment shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 19:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please block me. This site sucks. Best wishes. Nashhinton (talk) 19:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:THREAD

Hi, please take a few minutes to read WP:THREAD to learn how to indent your talk page discussions and why indenting is important (and courteous to other users). It's a short section, only about five paragraphs (not including the example). Best, Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:46, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced primary sources with secondary ones

And moved text to the body. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:46, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Nashhinton (talk) 06:47, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Criticism of the United States government, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Competence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Magnetic power concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Magnetic power, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Causes of mental disorders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Magnetic power

Hello, Nashhinton. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Magnetic power".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cannabis (drug), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Relaxation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apple flour

Hi, I added refs & made some corrections & additions to Apple flour. There were some factual errors in there as well as the lack of links & other issues. A lot of editors won't take time with things like that & just slap them back in to draft, or speedy delete them. It looks like you're still earning, you might want to use the Draft system and Articles for Creation system a bit more to get articles reviewed before taking them live. Let me know if I can help. JamesG5 (talk) 04:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm CaroleHenson. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Black Death, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –CaroleHenson (talk) 00:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, you've found a source. The citation is incomplete, though. If you give me the page number that says that the Black Death was second to the Great Famine, I will get it properly formatted for you.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Guy Macon 13:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Saturn Myth

The article The Saturn Myth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A7. This article gives no confidence that the notability requirements can be met. The book as a source about itself is not enough; coverage by independent reliable sources is required.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zero^talk 12:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles E. Alden

The article Charles E. Alden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. No mention by a trustworthy newspaper other than a debunking article by HuffPost. Rest of the mentions are by conspirancy theorists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Changeworld1984 (talk) 13:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I agree. Nashhinton (talk) 10:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

No matter how frustrated you may get, calling other editors trolls is not an option. If you're not able to control your anger when editing then you need to step away from the keyboard. Posting a false retired message and continuing to edit isn't the answer. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He is reverting valuable edits. He fits the very definition of a troll. He is disrupting this site. And who the fuck are you? His lackey? And to be honest, this site sucks. You can't edit anymore. This site is now a gang of trolls deleting articles. It's imploding itself. Nashhinton (talk) 23:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You believe the edits are valuable. Another editor disagrees. Now, per WP:BRD, you need to discuss the changes you want to make. It's not trolling, it's the very basis of how Wikipedia works. I'm no one's lackey, just an administrator warning you that continued personal attacks and incivility will lead to a block of your account.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you see his talk page? Many people complaining about him reverting valuable edits. I dont give a shit what he or his little minion (you) think. He's a disruptive troll and so are you. Exactly why this site is finished. Maybe don't have incompetent trolls as admins. Oh please block me! LOL. I will end my donations to this shit site. And the source you gave says it's optional. LOL. You don't know your own policies. Nashhinton (talk) 23:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BRD is an essay that explains the policy regarding Wikipedia:Consensus, hence why I linked it. WP:CIVILITY is not just a policy, it is a pillar of this website. You can appeal the block, but I won't be responding to you further.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I may be of use here. From what I can tell, this diff shows Remsense accidentally reverted your edit when rollbacking himself. I've had interactions with Remsense in the past, they're a good editor who spends a good chunk of time doing anti-vandalism patrolling. We all make mistakes, just remember to assume good faith. Sirocco745 (talk) 23:23, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:23, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can say what you want about me, I have a pretty much impenetrable skin, but you have continued your personal attacks against Remsense after I specifically warned you against doing so.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:23, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I don't care about your skin. I have many other devices at my disposal. I want you to block me indefinitely. If you can't do it now, I will wait to be unblocked and then have someone block me afterwards. The more time I have away from this shit site the better.Nashhinton (talk) 00:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for socking and threatening to continue disruption and evading block.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]