User talk:Namikilisu

Welcome

Hello, Namikilisu, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Bill william compton^Talk 15:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

February 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:44, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yunshui. How many times have I already applied. That is, my profile is not related to Gunka11, Ayselonline. Currently, I am invited to Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2022 as a representative of Azerbaijan.(https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_CEE_Meeting_2022/Participants/List) This is a fallacy. Please unblock my profile. Namikilisu (talk) 17:12, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Namikilisu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23969 was submitted on Feb 16, 2019 17:30:03. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Namikilisu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Namikilisu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My profile not sock puppet of Ayselonline. This is my profile on az.wikipedia. Namikilisu--Namikilisu (talk) 14:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Whether or not you are Ayselonline, there's technical evidence linking you to Mansur3456 and both technical and behavioural evidence linking you to Gunka11. You'll need to address that. Huon (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Namikilisu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My profile not sock puppet of Ayselonline. This is my profile on az.wikipedia. Namikilisu--Namikilisu (talk)

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Namikilisu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You mistakenly misled me with another profile.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My profile belongs to me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Namikilisu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My profile not sock puppet of Ayselonline. This is my profile on az.wikipedia. Namikilisu--Namikilisu (talk)

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Namikilisu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

173 / 5 000 Результаты перевода I got acquainted with the reasons for the block. I already think that these mistakes will not be made. I would like to add that the profile does not belong to anyone else, it is your own profile. Namikilisu (talk) 15:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This appeal makes no detail as to you actually explaining what your mistakes are, admitting or explaining them. And what do you mean the profile is "your own profile" (meaning my)? Nosebagbear (talk) 09:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes, I created a page based on someone else's opinion. I edited it. They did not accept him. I edited it again. I was finally blocked. In the end, I was considered the same profile as that person. In fact, I have a different profile.--Namikilisu (talk) 20:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Namikilisu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am asking the authorized admins to open my block. They mistakenly blocked me for another user's profile. I just edited an article with that profile. The article was later deleted. They blocked me with the name of that profile's puppet. Namikilisu (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It was said above that their is technical evidence here as well, its not just your editing- and editing the same topic as a blocked user is meat puppetry even if you are a different person. 331dot (talk) 10:47, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Namikilisu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the reasons for blocking. I already think that these errors will not happen again. I want to add that the profile does not belong to anyone else, it is my own profileNamikilisu (talk) 12:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

No evidence of recent block evasion, and the original incident was years ago; no apparent continued need for this block. -- asilvering (talk) 21:37, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Namikilisu, what contributions are you planning to make to English wikipedia? -- asilvering (talk) 03:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello asilvering. I plan to work more in the field of geography. More specifically, the geography of our country and the region where I live.--Namikilisu (talk) 07:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{Checkuser needed}} to see if there's recent evidence of socking.

@Namikilisu, you were blocked because of editing related to Amin Abbasov. Can you comment on that? -- asilvering (talk) 18:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note: I see no evidence of current sock puppetry. I'd recommend the reviewing admin(s) review Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ayselonline/Archive for background information. Courtesy ping to Yunshui, who commented there and blocked. Reaper Eternal (talk) 05:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I can't prove that that profile has nothing to do with me. Namikilisu (talk) 09:04, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Namikilisu, I'm not sure what you mean by that - you definitely created Draft:Amin Abbasov (singer), which was also edited by User:Gunka11. It's true that you weren't technically connected to Ayselonline, but you also turned up as a technical match for User:Mansur3456. What was going on there? -- asilvering (talk) 17:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can say about this: Ayselonline wrote to me from his Facebook profile and asked me to help him with his article Amin Abbasov. And that's what I did. Then the article was deleted. After that he wanted to continue by opening different profiles. In the end, they blocked him and me too. I may not remember some of the details since these were a long time ago. However, since this is a mistake, I have requested you to take my block many times. I have nothing to do with those accounts.I can say with certainty that all the accounts were opened by the same person: Gunay. Namikilisu (talk) 09:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that doesn't explain why you'd be a technical match for Mansur3456, but as that account never made any edits, let alone abusive ones, I suppose it doesn't really matter. I'll unblock without conditions, but please be aware that if you use multiple accounts in the future, people will be less likely to assume good faith than they might otherwise be. -- asilvering (talk) 21:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Namikilisu (talk) 11:15, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I should also mention that I participated in two different international Wikipedia events in 2022.[1], [2] Namikilisu (talk) 09:19, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's right. I created that article in a draft. It was later deleted. So I didn't interfere any more. Ayselonline interfered by creating fake profiles. In the end, they blocked me along with those profiles. Namikilisu (talk) 09:06, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yunshui: - how do you feel about a possible unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 15:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight, they've been gone for four years, so we're on our own. -- asilvering (talk) 17:46, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]