User talk:Name goes here
Welcome!
[edit]Thank you for allowing my Tetilla cheese edit to stand. No worries, and best wishes. Scott
Welcome to Wikipedia, Name goes here! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rystheguy and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Ry's the Guy (talk|contribs) 05:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Name goes here, you are invited to try Wikipedia training modules
[edit]If you're looking for some guidance on how to get started, try these training modules.
|
This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 18:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Name goes here, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Name goes here! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 07:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
WikiProject Investment
[edit]Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.
The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.
Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.
Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 20:04, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
ABA
[edit]I think your reversion of my edit to the ABA article was a mistake. You said there was a problem with neutrality, but all I did was correct a factual error, and facts are neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1510:91:552E:4680:3FCE:EF7F (talk) 03:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- My edit reversion in question changed the word "pseudoscientific" to "scientific", because (after briefly looking through the article) there seemed to be no general consensus that applied behavioral analysis was pseudoscientific in nature. If there is a good reason (based on the article) that it should be redefined as being pseudoscientific, please let me know so I can fix it. Thank you. Name goes here (talk | contribs) 03:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello!
[edit]I know this is silly to talk about, but I love the username you chose to edit articles. It's very creative in my opinion. Thank you for all of your edits and continue to make Wikipedia a better place. Marth The Hero King (talk) 18:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Marth The Hero King
- @Marth The Hero King: I wanted to choose a simple name (that ideally had something clever about it), so I came up with this; I'm glad that someone else appreciates my choice of username as well. Thank you very much for the kind words, and I hope you continue contributing to Wikipedia too! Name goes here (talk | contribs) 18:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
[edit]Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
TonyBallioni (talk) 01:11, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- @TonyBallioni: That was fast. Thank you very much! Name goes here (talk | contribs) 01:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Name goes here. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Name goes here. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Chimayo pepper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't appear to be a notable variety of pepper; I didn't find any in-depth sources about it on search of Google, GScholar, GNews, GBooks, only single-sentence mentions. The two sources currently cited do not appear to me to be RS - Pepperscale is a commercial site that sells pepper products, and Dave's Garden is at least partly user-generated (you can submit info) so that's right out.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Chimayo pepper for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chimayo pepper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimayo pepper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)